H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 4-1

Nicolas Almagro holds a 4–1 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nicolas Almagro leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2012 Australian Open first round 1-6 7-5 6-3 7-5.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
POL Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nicolas Almagro #10 1-6 7-5 6-3 7-5 Lukasz Kubot #58 Match data
May 24, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Lukasz Kubot #122 3-6 2-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #12 Match data
Oct 7, 2010* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #16 7-5 6-2 Lukasz Kubot #64 Match data
Jun 16, 2010* Eastbourne ATP 250 R32 Grass Nicolas Almagro #18 7-5 7-6(3) Lukasz Kubot #53 Match data
Apr 27, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Nicolas Almagro #34 6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 Lukasz Kubot #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 118 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Nicolas Almagro Lukasz Kubot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0
2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0
2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0
2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,486 0 0
2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0
2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,661 0 0
2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0
2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2012 21–26 44.7% #74 1,721 0 0
2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2013 10–16 38.5% #72 1,674 0 0
2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,673 0 0
2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,700 0 0
2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13