H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 4-0

Nicolas Almagro holds a 4–0 lead over Paolo Lorenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2017 Qatar Open first round 7-6(2) 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Paolo Lorenzi
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Almagro #44 7-6(2) 4-6 6-3 Paolo Lorenzi #40 Match data Jan 4, 2017* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Nicolas Almagro #123 3-0 (ret.) Paolo Lorenzi #99 Match data Apr 22, 2015* R64 Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay
Nicolas Almagro #12 6-4 6-4 Paolo Lorenzi #62 Match data Apr 13, 2013* QF U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP 250 Clay
Nicolas Almagro #13 6-3 7-5 6-4 Paolo Lorenzi #86 Match data May 29, 2012* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Nicolas Almagro #130 7-5 6-1 Paolo Lorenzi #247 Match data May 25, 2004* Q2 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Paolo Lorenzi #1,033 #33 1,223 1,823 105 181 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Paolo Lorenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,503 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10 2007 1–1 50.0% #294 1,492 0 0
26 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12 — — — — — — —
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12 2009 0–1 0.0% #84 1,437 0 0
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12 2010 2–14 12.5% #143 1,435 0 0
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2011 2–3 40.0% #108 1,516 0 0
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13 2012 8–17 32.0% #64 1,604 0 0
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13 2013 13–24 35.1% #109 1,646 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13 2014 11–14 44.0% #64 1,663 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2015 7–18 28.0% #68 1,615 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2016 24–25 49.0% #40 1,793 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2017 24–32 42.9% #43 1,700 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2018 6–15 28.6% #109 1,632 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2019 6–10 37.5% #115 1,628 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #146 1,536 0 1
39 — — — — — — — 2021 0–2 0.0% #274 1,493 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Almagro Paolo Lorenzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 7 10 30.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 17 26 34.6% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — 43 79 122 35.2% 57 81 138 41.3% 5 21 26 19.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's and 283/286 of Paolo Lorenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Almagro Paolo Lorenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2% 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 53.3% 42.5% 48.6% 41.7% 37.5% 45.3% 40.0%
25 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5% 2007 2/2 0.5 3.0 66.3% 62.4% 44.0% 46.4% 60.0% 55.5% 27.5%
26 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0% 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 54.3% 64.0% 28.6% 33.3% — 47.8% 17.9%
28 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5% 2010 16/16 4.1 4.3 61.0% 64.7% 44.6% 56.6% 27.2% 56.9% 33.2%
29 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5% 2011 5/5 1.8 2.8 65.2% 66.1% 42.6% 51.9% 38.0% 57.9% 36.6%
30 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1% 2012 25/25 2.6 2.0 61.5% 63.8% 48.2% 50.5% 34.3% 57.8% 34.1%
31 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5% 2013 37/37 2.9 2.3 57.2% 67.7% 49.8% 52.7% 36.3% 60.1% 36.2%
32 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4% 2014 25/25 3.8 2.1 57.6% 70.1% 48.9% 60.1% 48.5% 61.1% 39.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 25/25 4.2 2.6 56.5% 66.9% 49.3% 51.8% 40.9% 58.6% 31.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 47/49 4.0 2.6 56.3% 69.0% 48.1% 55.5% 43.8% 60.0% 37.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 55/56 4.5 2.8 58.5% 69.4% 52.7% 56.4% 38.4% 62.3% 34.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 21/21 5.4 3.4 57.6% 71.0% 45.0% 61.9% 37.0% 59.9% 33.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 5.0 3.3 60.6% 71.1% 51.4% 67.4% 45.2% 63.4% 30.6%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 2.8 3.0 56.9% 67.8% 43.1% 48.1% 24.2% 57.0% 33.4%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 2.5 2.5 61.3% 61.1% 32.2% 58.3% 50.0% 49.3% 25.6%
Career — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5% — 283/286 3.9 2.7 58.3% 68.1% 48.8% 55.8% 39.3% 60.0% 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Almagro Paolo Lorenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.82 2004 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) — +0.28 2005 1469 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) — +0.21 2006 1504 104.3 +3.27 -1.79 0.732 42.8% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.08
25 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) — +2.38 2007 1493 97.8 -0.64 -3.08 0.618 43.5% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
26 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) — +1.39 2008 1459 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) — +3.89 2009 1438 104.3 -4.82 +0.04 0.344 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
28 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.08 2010 1435 112.9 -3.79 -3.23 0.770 45.2% +6 +72 +28 20.0% -1.85 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.07
29 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -3.74 2011 1517 125.6 -0.71 +1.76 0.870 47.1% -1 — — 45.5% -1.00 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31
30 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.05 2012 1604 133.1 -3.58 -1.74 0.808 45.7% -7 -40 -150 33.9% -1.24 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.29
31 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.98 2013 1647 139.6 -1.95 -1.10 0.906 48.1% -26 -59 -191 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.92
32 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20 2014 1664 133.8 -1.37 +1.94 1.025 50.4% -26 +44 -207 42.1% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.70
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1615 126.4 -3.80 -3.71 0.748 45.0% +9 +14 — 31.7% -0.88 5–2 (71%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.18
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1793 148.1 -2.03 -0.06 0.925 48.8% -53 -16 -398 46.8% -0.22 11–6 (65%) 10–11 (48%) — +1.05
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1701 139.0 -1.35 -1.16 0.925 48.8% -33 +63 -290 45.9% -0.32 8–11 (42%) 15–16 (48%) — +2.90
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1632 123.3 -2.86 -2.73 0.824 47.1% +52 -8 -190 35.7% -0.70 0–4 (0%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.77
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1629 124.6 -0.47 -3.08 0.836 47.5% +77 -70 — 37.0% -0.67 5–3 (63%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.08
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1537 109.2 -1.98 -0.85 0.778 45.2% +108 — — 16.7% -1.67 1–0 0–1 — +0.68
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1494 93.1 -2.75 -1.01 0.505 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30
Career — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54 — 1824 134.2 -2.16 -1.27 0.869 47.5% -9 +4 -201 38.6% -0.71 41–46 (47%) 51–71 (42%) 98.6 +2.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.