H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Peter Gojowczyk H2H: 0-1

Peter Gojowczyk holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Gojowczyk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Gojowczyk won the 2016 Metz round of 32 6-4 6-7(11) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Peter Gojowczyk
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Peter Gojowczyk #209 6-4 6-7(11) 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #48 Match data Sep 22, 2016* R32 Metz ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Peter Gojowczyk #1,284 #39 1,175 1,884 75 97 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Peter Gojowczyk
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #494 1,515 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4 2012 0–1 0.0% #181 1,585 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5 2013 1–1 50.0% #162 1,609 0 0
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7 2014 7–8 46.7% #79 1,697 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10 2015 1–3 25.0% #194 1,652 0 0
26 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12 2016 1–2 33.3% #189 1,678 0 0
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12 2017 14–9 60.9% #60 1,809 0 1
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12 2018 23–25 47.9% #59 1,800 0 1
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2019 10–21 32.3% #117 1,672 0 1
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13 2020 1–3 25.0% #145 1,622 0 1
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13 2021 13–9 59.1% #86 1,757 0 1
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13 2022 4–14 22.2% #235 1,574 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Almagro Peter Gojowczyk
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2016 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2017 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — — 2018 17 17 34 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 8 14 22 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
30 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — 56 66 122 45.9% 7 17 24 29.2% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's and 171/172 of Peter Gojowczyk's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Almagro Peter Gojowczyk
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7% 2010 1/1 1.0 5.0 64.3% 47.6% 51.4% 30.0% 50.0% 49.0% 38.7%
21 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0% 2012 1/1 4.0 4.0 58.5% 56.9% 43.1% 47.1% 44.4% 51.2% 38.5%
23 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3% 2013 2/2 11.5 7.0 53.5% 76.7% 50.7% 63.1% 47.3% 64.8% 39.4%
24 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2% 2014 15/15 7.4 3.5 57.4% 74.7% 50.2% 69.6% 49.6% 64.1% 35.1%
25 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5% 2015 4/4 6.5 3.0 54.2% 72.3% 48.8% 60.7% 35.4% 61.5% 41.3%
26 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8% 2016 3/3 13.3 1.7 61.2% 75.8% 48.3% 70.8% 37.5% 65.1% 26.5%
27 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0% 2017 23/23 7.6 4.1 54.1% 78.0% 48.0% 53.8% 54.0% 64.1% 37.2%
28 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5% 2018 48/48 6.9 3.3 54.2% 75.4% 49.2% 55.9% 36.1% 63.2% 35.3%
29 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5% 2019 31/31 6.2 4.0 54.0% 70.0% 45.3% 54.6% 40.8% 58.7% 33.9%
30 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1% 2020 4/4 9.3 4.5 57.1% 72.9% 50.7% 50.0% 26.7% 63.2% 33.9%
31 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5% 2021 22/22 7.6 5.1 51.7% 78.0% 48.0% 65.7% 38.3% 63.5% 35.5%
32 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4% 2022 17/18 3.9 4.5 52.9% 65.5% 44.5% 51.3% 38.3% 55.6% 32.1%
Career — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5% — 171/172 6.9 4.0 54.2% 73.7% 47.8% 57.5% 41.1% 61.7% 35.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Almagro Peter Gojowczyk
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01 2007 1484 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.67 2008 1463 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -2.25 2010 1516 104.5 +0.44 +1.12 0.759 45.0% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.20
21 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.58 2011 1506 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.82 2012 1585 118.6 -1.08 -5.85 0.788 45.0% — — — 40.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.02
23 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) — +0.28 2013 1610 112.7 -1.87 +0.62 1.118 51.5% — — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.36
24 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) — +0.21 2014 1697 138.1 +0.13 +0.88 0.980 50.0% +27 -187 -115 47.4% -0.16 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.47
25 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) — +2.38 2015 1653 118.0 +0.17 +0.96 1.073 51.7% +47 — — 33.3% 0.00 — — — +0.08
26 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) — +1.39 2016 1678 121.7 +1.67 -1.23 0.759 46.8% +42 — — 25.0% -0.88 1–0 0–2 — -0.59
27 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) — +3.89 2017 1810 134.4 -0.07 +0.58 1.038 50.9% -21 — -60 55.2% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.94
28 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.08 2018 1800 151.9 -0.36 -0.06 0.961 49.3% -3 -173 — 46.4% -0.20 11–3 (79%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.51
29 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -3.74 2019 1672 144.1 -3.39 -1.36 0.820 46.7% +60 -106 +26 36.7% -0.85 5–7 (42%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.60
30 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.05 2020 1623 120.0 -1.23 -1.08 0.921 48.9% +60 — — 30.8% -0.46 — 1–1 — +0.24
31 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.98 2021 1758 125.5 -0.63 -0.49 0.973 49.7% +19 — -47 54.1% +0.10 7–2 (78%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.90
32 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20 2022 1575 116.4 -5.50 -2.19 0.723 44.1% +37 — +117 16.7% -2.36 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1567 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54 — 1885 137.5 -1.36 -0.43 0.916 48.6% +20 -162 -24 43.5% -0.44 32–21 (60%) 29–37 (44%) 103.1 -0.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.