H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-3

Radek Stepanek holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2013 Canada Masters second round 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 2013* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Radek Stepanek #51 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #14 Match data
Aug 29, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nicolas Almagro #12 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Radek Stepanek #38 Match data
Nov 10, 2010* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #41 7-6(3) 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #16 Match data
May 7, 2005* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Radek Stepanek #17 4-6 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5