H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Robin Soderling H2H: 3-5

Robin Soderling holds a 5–3 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 3–2 on clay, while Robin Soderling leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2011 Rome Masters fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-4.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
SWE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Robin Soderling #5 6-3 3-6 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #10 Match data
Oct 8, 2010* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Robin Soderling #5 7-5 4-6 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #16 Match data
Jul 18, 2010* Bastad ATP 250 F Clay Nicolas Almagro #20 7-5 3-6 6-2 Robin Soderling #5 Match data
May 12, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Almagro #35 6-4 7-5 Robin Soderling #7 Match data
Oct 14, 2009* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Robin Soderling #11 6-4 7-5 Nicolas Almagro #29 Match data
Jul 24, 2009* Hamburg ATP 500 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #40 7-5 6-3 Robin Soderling #11 Match data
Jul 18, 2009* Bastad ATP 250 QF Clay Robin Soderling #12 7-5 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #41 Match data
Jun 28, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Robin Soderling #12 7-6(7) 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,172 285 166 63.2% 0 1 0 2 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Robin Soderling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,518 0 0
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,554 0 0
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 2004 31–26 54.4% #34 1,824 0 1
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,831 0 2
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2008 40–19 67.8% #17 1,959 0 3
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,070 0 4
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,118 0 6
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13