H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nicolas Almagro vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 2-0
Nicolas Almagro holds a 2–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2015 Miami Masters first round 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2015* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2011* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-2 7-6(5) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nicolas Almagro | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |