H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 2-0

Nicolas Almagro holds a 2–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2015 Miami Open first round 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Almagro #74 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 Sergiy Stakhovsky #51 Match data Mar 27, 2015* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Nicolas Almagro #10 6-2 7-6(5) Sergiy Stakhovsky #43 Match data Aug 11, 2011* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Sergiy Stakhovsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0
22 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4
26 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Almagro Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
20 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
30 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's and 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Almagro Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8% 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2%
19 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6% 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3%
20 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7% 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8%
21 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7% 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6%
22 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0% 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6%
23 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3% 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5%
24 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2% 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6%
25 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5% 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8%
26 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8% 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7%
27 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0% 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6%
28 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5% 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9%
29 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5% 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1%
30 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1% 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7%
31 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5% 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9%
32 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4% 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1%
Career — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5% — 340/341 6.6 2.7 62.2% 71.3% 49.6% 59.0% 38.3% 63.1% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Almagro Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.67 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01
19 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.44 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 — — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.25
20 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -2.25 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — -0.41
21 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.58 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.11
22 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.82 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 — — 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -0.41
23 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) — +0.28 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) — +1.40
24 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) — +0.21 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) — -0.67
25 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) — +2.38 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.79
26 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) — +1.39 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) — -1.40
27 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) — +3.89 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.19
28 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.08 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.26
29 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -3.74 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.06
30 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.05 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 — +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.26
31 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.98 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 — 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.83
32 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% — — +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 — +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.66
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.10
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 — +0.06
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1516 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54 — 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.