H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Almagro vs Tatsuma Ito H2H: 0-1
Tatsuma Ito holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatsuma Ito leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatsuma Ito won the 2012 Tokyo third round 7-6(4) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2012* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Tatsuma Ito | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| Tatsuma Ito | #1,822 | #60 | 725 | 1,726 | 28 | 56 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Almagro | Tatsuma Ito | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #186 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |