H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Nicolas Almagro vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 2-0
Nicolas Almagro holds a 2–0 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2010 Madrid Masters second round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2010* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-1 7-6(3) | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2008* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-2 (ret.) | Viktor Troicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Almagro | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |