H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Nicolas Escude vs Albert Portas H2H: 0-1
Albert Portas holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Escude in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Portas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 2001 Rome Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2001* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Albert Portas | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |