H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Escude vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 4-3

Nicolas Escude holds a 4–3 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2002 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 4-6 3-1 RET.

FRA Age 50 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 2002* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Cedric Pioline #98 4-6 3-1 (ret.) Nicolas Escude #33 Match data
Feb 16, 2002* Marseille ATP 250 SF Hard Nicolas Escude #27 6-3 7-5 Cedric Pioline #99 Match data
May 17, 2001* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Escude #36 6-4 3-6 6-1 Cedric Pioline #43 Match data
Mar 15, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Escude #30 7-5 7-6(4) Cedric Pioline #11 Match data
Oct 21, 1999* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Nicolas Escude #50 6-1 6-0 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data
Feb 6, 1999* Marseille ATP 250 QF Hard Cedric Pioline #18 7-6(7) 7-6(5) Nicolas Escude #107 Match data
Oct 6, 1995* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Cedric Pioline #60 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Escude #248 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Escude #1,071 #17 1,357 1,909 157 124 55.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Escude Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 0–1 0.0% #670 1,497 0 0
19 1995 1–2 33.3% #189 1,503 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1997 6–6 50.0% #93 1,620 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1998 22–22 50.0% #37 1,699 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1999 19–15 55.9% #37 1,820 0 1 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 2000 26–22 54.2% #48 1,717 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 2001 28–23 54.9% #27 1,724 0 2 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 2002 29–15 65.9% #34 1,842 0 3 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2003 11–10 52.4% #114 1,790 0 3 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2004 15–8 65.2% #64 1,829 0 4 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5