H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Escude vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 0-1
Guillaume Raoux holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Escude in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1998 US Open first round 6-3 3-6 6-3 1-6 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Guillaume Raoux | 6-3 3-6 6-3 1-6 7-6(6) | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |