H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Nicolas Escude vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 3-0
Nicolas Escude holds a 3–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2004 Australian Open first round 6-3 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-3 7-6(5) 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2004* | Doha | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-4 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-2 6-1 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nicolas Escude | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |