H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC
Nicolas Escude holds a 1–0 lead over Jan Kroslak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 1999 Moscow round of 16 6-1 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Jan Kroslak | Match data | Nov 12, 1999* | R16 | Moscow | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,918 | 157 | 125 | 55.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Jan Kroslak | — | — | — | 1,752 | 67 | 90 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Jan Kroslak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #48 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 13–26 | 33.3% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,834 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Jan Kroslak | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1996 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1998 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1997 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% |
| 23 | 1999 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1998 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2000 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1999 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 25 | 2001 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2000 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2002 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 2001 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 96 | 61 | 157 | 61.1% | 18 | 27 | 45 | 40.0% | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | 22 | 23 | 45 | 48.9% | — | 35 | 40 | 75 | 46.7% | 6 | 19 | 25 | 24.0% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 22 | 22 | 44 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Jan Kroslak | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1993 | 1498 | 100.2 | -2.06 | +3.59 | 0.464 | 34.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 1505 | 108.2 | -1.55 | -1.30 | 0.817 | 47.2% | +30 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1569 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | +62 | -74 | — | 40.0% | -0.54 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–5 (29%) | 102.8 | +0.61 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1621 | 125.8 | +0.79 | +0.26 | 0.983 | 49.9% | -43 | -32 | — | 48.4% | -0.03 | — | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.37 | 1996 | 1618 | 128.6 | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | +9 | 43.2% | -0.57 | 5–3 (63%) | 5–6 (45%) | 101.5 | +0.45 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1708 | 143.8 | -0.82 | +1.23 | 0.950 | 49.2% | +9 | -93 | -49 | 50.0% | -0.08 | 9–6 (60%) | 8–4 (67%) | 109.7 | -1.77 | 1997 | 1652 | 123.1 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -152 | — | 50.6% | -0.03 | 8–2 (80%) | 6–6 (50%) | 105.5 | +1.83 |
| 23 | 1999 | 1822 | 146.6 | +1.88 | +1.67 | 1.082 | 51.3% | +16 | — | — | 55.3% | +0.26 | 7–6 (54%) | 11–6 (65%) | 103.6 | -1.08 | 1998 | 1713 | 142.4 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -206 | — | 44.4% | -0.53 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.6 | -2.07 |
| 24 | 2000 | 1703 | 140.2 | +1.39 | +1.93 | 1.082 | 51.3% | +57 | -129 | -9 | 53.7% | +0.40 | 6–9 (40%) | 7–14 (33%) | 88.0 | +1.03 | 1999 | 1601 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -174 | -57 | 37.4% | -1.08 | 5–5 (50%) | 10–5 (67%) | 104.3 | +0.88 |
| 25 | 2001 | 1723 | 146.5 | +0.67 | +0.71 | 1.001 | 49.9% | -9 | -144 | +98 | 55.0% | +0.43 | 9–8 (53%) | 10–12 (45%) | 98.3 | -0.53 | 2000 | 1550 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | +46 | -123 | — | 36.1% | -0.81 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.3 | +1.07 |
| 26 | 2002 | 1847 | 151.5 | +3.07 | +1.82 | 1.161 | 52.3% | +54 | -306 | -51 | 63.1% | +0.66 | 8–7 (53%) | 14–2 (88%) | 109.1 | -0.81 | 2001 | 1530 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.31 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1803 | 136.0 | +1.80 | +1.45 | 1.069 | 51.5% | +113 | — | -32 | 59.6% | +0.55 | 3–1 (75%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.4 | -1.00 | 2002 | 1494 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 1835 | 138.5 | +1.43 | +2.19 | 1.155 | 52.1% | +25 | -193 | — | 67.3% | +1.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.3 | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1918 | 150.4 | +1.26 | +1.47 | 1.054 | 50.8% | +30 | -138 | +11 | 55.8% | +0.35 | 44–39 (53%) | 68–50 (58%) | 104.7 | -1.82 | — | 1753 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -155 | -20 | 42.2% | -0.60 | 26–17 (60%) | 29–28 (51%) | 106.4 | +1.96 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 6 | 4 | 10 | Mar 19, 2003 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 11, 2002 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 21, 2002 | H2H |
| Younes El Aynaoui | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jan 8, 2004 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 3 | 2 | 5 | Mar 18, 2003 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 2000 | H2H |
| MaliVai Washington | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 1, 1999 | H2H |
| Jonas Bjorkman | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 26, 1999 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Fredrik Jonsson | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 4, 2000 | H2H |