H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nicolas Escude vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 0-2
Jeff Tarango holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Escude in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1999 Lyon fourth round 6-2 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1999* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jeff Tarango | 6-2 1-6 6-1 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1998* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jeff Tarango | 6-3 6-3 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Jeff Tarango | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 |