H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nicolas Escude vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 1-1
Nicolas Escude and Jonathan Stark are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on clay, while Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Stark won the 1999 Chennai third round 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1999* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jonathan Stark | 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
| May 30, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Nicolas Escude | 6-4 6-2 6-2 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |