H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 13:16 UTC
Nicolas Escude vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Escude holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Gicquel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2002 Marseille fourth round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2002* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-1 7-6(3) | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Marc Gicquel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |