H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Escude vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 1-0

Nicolas Escude holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Gicquel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2002 Marseille round of 16 6-1 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Escude
FRA Age 50 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Escude #27 6-1 7-6(3) Marc Gicquel #369 Match data Feb 15, 2002* R16 Marseille ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Escude #1,071 #17 1,357 1,918 157 125 55.7% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Escude Marc Gicquel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 0–1 0.0% #670 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1995 1–2 33.3% #189 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1997 6–6 50.0% #93 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1998 22–22 50.0% #37 1,708 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1999 19–15 55.9% #37 1,821 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2000 26–23 53.1% #48 1,703 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2001 28–23 54.9% #27 1,722 0 2 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0
26 2002 29–15 65.9% #34 1,846 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2003 11–10 52.4% #114 1,802 0 3 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0
28 2004 15–8 65.2% #64 1,834 0 4 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Escude Marc Gicquel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 13 11 24 54.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 16 11 27 59.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 15 5 20 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 10 5 15 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2004 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 61 157 61.1% 18 27 45 40.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 22 23 45 48.9% — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 238/282 of Nicolas Escude's and 205/205 of Marc Gicquel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Escude Marc Gicquel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1993 1/1 0.0 3.0 53.8% 51.4% 30.0% 41.7% 0.0% 41.5% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 3/3 0.7 2.3 61.4% 64.7% 50.6% 56.7% 23.6% 59.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 9/12 4.7 3.1 56.8% 70.9% 53.7% 71.4% 37.5% 63.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 32/44 6.4 3.4 57.0% 70.0% 47.6% 61.1% 39.2% 60.1% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 28/34 6.3 2.6 57.0% 71.3% 54.2% 62.4% 45.9% 63.7% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 43/49 6.5 3.6 51.7% 75.2% 51.3% 52.4% 36.7% 63.8% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 41/51 6.0 3.8 54.4% 71.8% 50.6% 59.5% 46.5% 62.2% 37.8% 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8%
26 2002 38/44 7.7 4.5 58.9% 76.4% 51.3% 60.5% 43.6% 66.0% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 20/21 8.2 4.0 57.7% 75.1% 49.2% 59.8% 46.6% 64.1% 38.4% 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3%
28 2004 23/23 7.3 2.4 59.7% 75.5% 53.2% 62.6% 42.2% 66.4% 38.8% 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0%
Career — 238/282 6.6 3.5 56.2% 73.3% 51.0% 59.6% 42.0% 63.5% 38.5% — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Escude Marc Gicquel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1993 1498 100.2 -2.06 +3.59 0.464 34.1% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1505 108.2 -1.55 -1.30 0.817 47.2% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — 1–1 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1621 125.8 +0.79 +0.26 0.983 49.9% -43 -32 — 48.4% -0.03 — 4–3 (57%) — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1708 143.8 -0.82 +1.23 0.950 49.2% +9 -93 -49 50.0% -0.08 9–6 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 109.7 -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1822 146.6 +1.88 +1.67 1.082 51.3% +16 — — 55.3% +0.26 7–6 (54%) 11–6 (65%) 103.6 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 1704 140.2 +1.39 +1.93 1.082 51.3% +56 -130 -10 53.7% +0.40 6–9 (40%) 7–14 (33%) 88.0 +1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1723 146.5 +0.67 +0.71 1.001 49.9% -9 -144 +98 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 10–12 (45%) 98.3 -0.53 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17
26 2002 1847 151.5 +3.07 +1.82 1.161 52.3% +54 -306 -51 63.1% +0.66 8–7 (53%) 14–2 (88%) 109.1 -0.81 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1803 136.0 +1.80 +1.45 1.069 51.5% +113 — -32 59.6% +0.55 3–1 (75%) 6–4 (60%) 101.4 -1.00 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55
28 2004 1835 138.5 +1.43 +2.19 1.155 52.1% +25 -193 — 67.3% +1.00 2–2 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 100.3 -0.24 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 102.6 +0.08
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 104.0 -0.22
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) 96.8 +0.69
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.21
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13
Career — 1918 150.4 +1.26 +1.47 1.054 50.8% +30 -138 +10 55.8% +0.35 44–39 (53%) 68–50 (58%) 104.7 -1.82 — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.