H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Escude vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Escude holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 1998 Australian Open fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 1998* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 7-6(4) 6-3 6-2 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |