H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Nicolas Escude vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 2-0
Nicolas Escude holds a 2–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2004 Roland Garros first round 7-6(7) 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Nicolas Escude | 7-6(7) 6-2 6-2 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2000* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-3 6-3 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |