H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Jarry vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 2-1
Nicolas Jarry holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Jarry leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2022 Gstaad quarterfinal 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2022* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(8) | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2018 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2018* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Nicolas Jarry | 6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(3) | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2018* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Nicolas Jarry | 7-5 6-3 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Jarry | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |