H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 01:16 UTC
Nicolas Jarry vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 0-2
Kyle Edmund holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Jarry in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2019 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2019* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-2 6-0 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Jarry | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |