H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Nicolas Jarry vs Marcel Granollers H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Jarry holds a 1–0 lead over Marcel Granollers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Jarry leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Jarry won the 2019 Barcelona second round 7-5 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2019 | Tokyo | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Marcel Granollers | 6-1 1-6 6-2 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2019* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Nicolas Jarry | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Marcel Granollers | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2019 | Barcelona | ATP 500 | Q2 | Clay | Marcel Granollers | 6-7(3) 7-5 6-4 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Marcel Granollers | #1,009 | #19 | 1,635 | 1,934 | 202 | 245 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Jarry | Marcel Granollers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #56 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #38 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #46 | 1,781 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #37 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #177 | 1,702 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,724 | 0 | 4 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |