H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Nicolas Jarry vs Roman Safiullin H2H: 1-1
Nicolas Jarry and Roman Safiullin are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roman Safiullin leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicolas Jarry leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Jarry won the 2023 Cincinnati Masters second round 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2023* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Jarry | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Roman Safiullin | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2023* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Clay | Roman Safiullin | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Roman Safiullin | #96 | #36 | 1,190 | 1,930 | 56 | 74 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Jarry | Roman Safiullin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #88 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #39 | 1,890 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #60 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #172 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |