H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Kiefer vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-1

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 2–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2001 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2001* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Nicolas Kiefer #37 6-3 6-0 Cedric Pioline #39 Match data
Feb 19, 2000* Rotterdam ATP 250 QF Hard Cedric Pioline #15 2-6 6-3 7-5 Nicolas Kiefer #4 Match data
Feb 25, 1999* London ATP 250 R32 Carpet Nicolas Kiefer #35 5-7 6-2 7-5 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5