H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Nicolas Kiefer vs Dmitri Sitak.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Kiefer | 6-1 6-4 | Dmitri Sitak | Match data | Oct 20, 2009* | Q3 | Moscow | ATP 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,995 | 347 | 255 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Dmitri Sitak | #1,564 | #356 | 86 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Kiefer | Dmitri Sitak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,922 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #21 | 1,886 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,862 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,906 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,762 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,722 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nicolas Kiefer | Dmitri Sitak | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1994 | 1489 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 1528 | 117.0 | +1.19 | -1.22 | 1.032 | 51.3% | +26 | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1563 | 122.9 | +0.33 | +1.12 | 1.067 | 50.9% | +8 | -24 | — | 44.1% | +0.09 | 0–1 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1799 | 139.8 | +1.52 | -0.54 | 1.021 | 50.8% | -25 | -229 | -48 | 55.6% | +0.30 | 14–3 (82%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1792 | 151.1 | +0.77 | +1.69 | 1.039 | 50.9% | +29 | -161 | -60 | 55.6% | +0.37 | 10–11 (48%) | 12–8 (60%) | — | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 1923 | 157.7 | +2.57 | +3.33 | 1.144 | 52.6% | +23 | -302 | -126 | 65.4% | +0.99 | 15–6 (71%) | 16–8 (67%) | — | +0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 1900 | 146.0 | +2.09 | +2.25 | 1.124 | 52.3% | +54 | -332 | -120 | 61.3% | +0.85 | 9–2 (82%) | 7–6 (54%) | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 1763 | 149.2 | -1.17 | +2.22 | 1.001 | 50.2% | +25 | -132 | +43 | 53.5% | +0.24 | 6–10 (38%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -2.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 1718 | 142.5 | -0.77 | +1.14 | 0.977 | 49.8% | +5 | -139 | +119 | 46.5% | -0.05 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | -0.90 | 2007 | 1484 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 1727 | 134.5 | +0.10 | +0.13 | 0.980 | 49.8% | +22 | -144 | +93 | 48.1% | -0.22 | 6–1 (86%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 1887 | 148.7 | +1.38 | +2.62 | 1.092 | 51.5% | +33 | -284 | -100 | 60.2% | +0.52 | 12–6 (67%) | 14–7 (67%) | — | +0.23 | 2009 | 1498 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 1862 | 154.9 | +1.31 | +3.44 | 1.125 | 52.2% | +10 | -139 | -50 | 60.9% | +0.77 | 8–8 (50%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -1.12 | 2010 | 1471 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 1863 | 140.5 | -0.75 | +2.34 | 1.039 | 50.6% | +65 | -104 | — | 60.0% | +0.60 | 8–3 (73%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 1907 | 153.1 | +4.21 | +1.95 | 1.186 | 52.7% | +55 | — | -153 | 65.2% | +0.94 | 1–1 | 8–5 (62%) | — | -1.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1889 | 153.4 | +2.15 | +3.22 | 1.128 | 51.9% | +5 | -79 | -37 | 57.0% | +0.37 | 7–5 (58%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | -1.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 1762 | 145.0 | -1.02 | -0.24 | 0.930 | 49.3% | +63 | +45 | +54 | 48.5% | -0.09 | 4–4 (50%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -1.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1722 | 106.1 | +0.99 | -2.77 | 0.774 | 46.3% | — | — | +51 | 27.3% | -1.09 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1995 | 155.1 | +1.02 | +1.86 | 1.060 | 51.2% | +25 | -127 | -17 | 56.7% | +0.45 | 106–67 (61%) | 107–77 (58%) | 111.9 | -1.01 | — | 1503 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 3 | 12 | 15 | Mar 30, 2009 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 6 | 8 | 14 | Oct 23, 2003 | H2H |
| Fabrice Santoro | 3 | 7 | 10 | Jun 24, 2009 | H2H |
| Jonas Bjorkman | 6 | 4 | 10 | Jun 11, 2004 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 7 | 3 | 10 | Feb 21, 2004 | H2H |
No career rivalry data available.