H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Kiefer vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 2-1 (incl. walkovers)

Nicolas Kiefer vs Dmitry Tursunov: 2–0 excluding walkovers; 2–1 including 1 walkover. Across 3 main-draw results including walkovers, Nicolas Kiefer leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2008 Qatar Open second round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H including walkovers
2 – 1
3 main-draw results
Dmitry Tursunov
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dmitry Tursunov #34 (w/o) Nicolas Kiefer #49 Match data Jan 4, 2008* R16 Qatar Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Nicolas Kiefer #254 1-6 6-4 6-3 Dmitry Tursunov #24 Match data Aug 7, 2007* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Nicolas Kiefer #46 6-4 6-4 Dmitry Tursunov #74 Match data Mar 5, 2004* R16 Scottsdale International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,995 347 255 57.6% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,912 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,563 0 0 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
19 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,799 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,792 0 1 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,922 0 4 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,679 0 0
22 2000 30–16 65.2% #20 1,900 0 6 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,741 0 0
23 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,763 0 6 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,778 0 1
24 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,717 0 6 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6 2008 35–22 61.4% #22 1,859 0 5
26 2004 34–20 63.0% #21 1,886 0 6 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,862 0 6 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,715 0 6
28 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,863 0 6 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,770 0 7
29 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,906 0 6 2012 3–10 23.1% #122 1,693 0 7
30 2008 22–17 56.4% #38 1,889 0 6 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,762 0 6 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,766 0 7
32 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,722 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,689 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,632 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Dmitry Tursunov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 24 15 39 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 41 15 56 73.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2000 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 2006 31 16 47 66.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2002 10 15 25 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 15 11 26 57.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2003 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 28 14 42 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2004 30 14 44 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 7 14 21 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2005 15 13 28 53.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2010 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2006 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 12 15 27 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2007 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
30 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 24 14 38 63.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 221 145 366 60.4% 47 55 102 46.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 35 25 60 58.3% — 151 135 286 52.8% 27 44 71 38.0% 37 30 67 55.2% 8 8 16 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 537/601 of Nicolas Kiefer's and 429/440 of Dmitry Tursunov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1995 6/6 4.7 2.3 61.5% 72.6% 51.3% 62.7% 44.1% 64.8% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 11/16 6.1 2.5 52.2% 76.6% 47.8% 53.2% 49.7% 62.7% 39.8% 2001 3/4 6.7 4.0 57.0% 76.5% 45.5% 45.6% 18.6% 63.4% 33.6%
19 1997 37/42 7.9 3.5 55.2% 77.0% 48.3% 60.5% 52.5% 64.1% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 49/56 6.2 4.7 53.7% 74.8% 47.8% 55.1% 44.4% 62.5% 39.0% 2003 5/5 12.2 5.8 52.6% 70.3% 45.4% 47.1% 44.7% 58.6% 36.1%
21 1999 56/74 6.6 4.3 51.5% 75.7% 53.2% 61.8% 43.5% 64.7% 40.4% 2004 29/29 6.9 5.0 53.5% 68.2% 50.3% 62.3% 34.5% 59.9% 34.8%
22 2000 38/46 6.4 4.3 52.7% 74.9% 52.3% 61.7% 48.3% 64.3% 40.1% 2005 31/32 9.0 5.7 55.2% 77.7% 46.4% 65.7% 48.7% 63.8% 39.2%
23 2001 44/51 6.3 4.1 50.3% 71.1% 48.8% 54.0% 50.7% 60.0% 40.0% 2006 72/73 8.7 3.8 54.8% 74.5% 50.9% 58.9% 41.5% 63.6% 38.0%
24 2002 40/43 6.2 4.5 52.6% 74.1% 47.8% 58.8% 50.7% 61.5% 37.6% 2007 49/49 8.2 4.0 56.0% 74.9% 54.1% 49.4% 44.9% 65.7% 35.8%
25 2003 36/36 6.5 3.8 50.8% 73.1% 49.9% 58.1% 44.7% 61.8% 37.4% 2008 53/57 8.0 3.2 58.4% 75.1% 51.7% 65.9% 40.8% 65.1% 36.0%
26 2004 51/54 7.3 3.8 54.9% 77.8% 48.4% 61.1% 41.4% 64.5% 38.7% 2009 30/30 6.4 3.3 57.2% 73.8% 51.1% 64.0% 45.2% 64.0% 35.6%
27 2005 52/53 7.6 3.8 53.4% 74.2% 51.4% 56.4% 51.3% 63.6% 40.9% 2010 15/15 5.7 2.4 62.2% 69.5% 55.4% 58.5% 47.7% 64.2% 33.6%
28 2006 21/22 7.4 4.0 51.7% 72.0% 50.1% 59.5% 43.3% 61.3% 40.2% 2011 35/36 6.6 4.1 60.6% 70.5% 49.8% 60.7% 42.6% 62.1% 34.0%
29 2007 30/31 6.7 2.5 57.0% 79.9% 51.6% 64.6% 33.9% 67.8% 38.1% 2012 12/13 6.2 2.7 58.5% 73.9% 46.6% 59.3% 22.0% 62.1% 32.5%
30 2008 34/39 7.2 2.4 53.6% 76.3% 51.9% 55.4% 44.9% 64.9% 39.6% 2013 50/51 7.4 4.6 57.8% 74.3% 50.0% 59.7% 44.2% 63.7% 36.5%
31 2009 28/28 7.7 3.9 52.0% 75.0% 47.3% 62.9% 45.8% 61.9% 35.4% 2014 31/32 5.6 3.1 61.3% 68.8% 50.5% 64.7% 46.4% 61.9% 35.0%
32 2010 4/4 11.3 6.5 51.8% 77.7% 47.3% 55.7% 31.0% 63.0% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 8/8 4.8 3.1 60.7% 66.9% 48.4% 60.5% 43.2% 59.5% 31.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 65.3% 62.5% 40.5% 54.0% 35.1% 54.9% 30.2%
Career — 537/602 6.9 3.8 53.1% 75.1% 49.9% 58.9% 46.0% 63.3% 38.9% — 429/440 7.4 3.9 57.4% 73.1% 50.5% 60.1% 42.4% 63.3% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1489 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1528 117.0 +1.19 -1.22 1.032 51.3% +26 — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1563 122.9 +0.33 +1.12 1.067 50.9% +8 -24 — 44.1% +0.09 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.80 2001 1543 113.3 -0.56 +1.80 0.919 47.8% +43 — — 66.7% +0.44 1–0 2–0 — +0.16
19 1997 1799 139.8 +1.52 -0.54 1.021 50.8% -25 -229 -48 55.6% +0.30 14–3 (82%) 8–7 (53%) 112.8 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1792 151.1 +0.77 +1.69 1.039 50.9% +29 -161 -60 55.6% +0.37 10–11 (48%) 12–8 (60%) 100.3 -0.30 2003 1611 120.7 -1.94 +0.40 0.873 47.6% +63 — — 38.9% -0.28 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.16
21 1999 1923 157.7 +2.57 +3.33 1.144 52.6% +23 -302 -126 65.4% +0.99 15–6 (71%) 16–8 (67%) 110.9 +0.49 2004 1679 122.1 -2.57 -0.92 0.868 47.7% -8 -166 -127 41.8% -0.52 7–5 (58%) 7–7 (50%) 102.4 -1.08
22 2000 1900 146.0 +2.09 +2.25 1.124 52.3% +54 -332 -120 61.3% +0.85 9–2 (82%) 7–6 (54%) 104.4 -0.03 2005 1742 140.2 +0.93 +1.97 1.082 51.8% -49 — -30 52.9% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 8–7 (53%) 100.0 -1.22
23 2001 1763 149.2 -1.17 +2.22 1.001 50.2% +25 -132 +43 53.5% +0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 97.2 -2.55 2006 1778 142.8 +1.19 +1.27 1.045 50.9% -3 -200 -16 55.3% +0.27 16–17 (48%) 19–13 (59%) 102.4 +1.38
24 2002 1718 142.5 -0.77 +1.14 0.977 49.8% +5 -139 +119 46.5% -0.05 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.4 -0.90 2007 1767 135.6 +1.31 -0.47 1.044 50.8% +2 -220 +74 54.5% +0.32 12–9 (57%) 12–7 (63%) 104.7 +2.65
25 2003 1727 134.5 +0.10 +0.13 0.980 49.8% +22 -144 +93 48.1% -0.22 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) 106.1 +0.36 2008 1860 147.7 +1.87 +0.11 1.032 50.6% +36 -281 +4 57.0% +0.36 10–3 (77%) 14–11 (56%) 107.5 -0.15
26 2004 1887 148.7 +1.38 +2.62 1.092 51.5% +33 -284 -100 60.2% +0.52 12–6 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 109.1 +0.23 2009 1702 134.8 +0.01 -1.06 0.988 50.2% +12 — +189 47.9% +0.10 6–5 (55%) 5–10 (33%) 93.7 +1.41
27 2005 1862 154.9 +1.31 +3.44 1.125 52.2% +10 -139 -50 60.9% +0.77 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 100.4 -1.12 2010 1715 128.5 +1.03 -0.62 0.937 49.0% +10 — — 43.6% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 -0.47
28 2006 1863 140.5 -0.75 +2.34 1.039 50.6% +65 -104 — 60.0% +0.60 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +0.78 2011 1770 139.9 -0.29 -2.16 0.896 48.5% -29 — +155 50.0% -0.27 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 105.2 -0.69
29 2007 1907 153.1 +4.21 +1.95 1.186 52.7% +55 — -153 65.2% +0.94 1–1 8–5 (62%) — -1.12 2012 1693 121.2 -0.78 -2.26 0.857 47.3% +20 — +108 28.1% -1.16 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.15
30 2008 1889 153.4 +2.15 +3.22 1.128 51.9% +5 -79 -37 57.0% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) 102.3 -1.13 2013 1869 152.8 +0.49 -0.37 1.006 50.7% +24 -219 — 58.8% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 15–5 (75%) 112.1 +0.52
31 2009 1762 145.0 -1.02 -0.24 0.930 49.3% +63 +45 +54 48.5% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 99.1 -1.73 2014 1766 144.7 -1.43 -0.21 0.917 49.1% +26 -36 -10 46.2% -0.08 2–4 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 98.4 +0.04
32 2010 1722 106.1 +0.99 -2.77 0.774 46.3% — — +51 27.3% -1.09 1–1 0–1 — -0.60 2015 1753 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1690 111.7 -2.62 -1.37 0.772 46.5% +48 — — 25.0% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 -0.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1633 107.5 -2.99 -2.95 0.668 42.8% +52 — — 15.4% -2.46 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
Career — 1995 155.1 +1.02 +1.86 1.060 51.2% +25 -127 -17 56.7% +0.45 106–67 (61%) 107–77 (58%) 111.9 -1.01 — 1912 145.7 +0.30 -0.19 0.978 49.9% +7 -180 +50 50.7% +0.03 82–72 (53%) 104–89 (54%) 106.7 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.