H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Kiefer vs Frantisek Cermak H2H: 0-1

Frantisek Cermak holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frantisek Cermak leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Frantisek Cermak won the 2003 Libéma Open round of 32 6-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Frantisek Cermak
CZE Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frantisek Cermak #362 6-3 (ret.) Nicolas Kiefer #73 Match data Jun 19, 2003* R32 Libéma Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,995 347 255 57.6% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Frantisek Cermak #1,131 #201 180 1,567 9 15 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Frantisek Cermak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,799 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,792 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,922 0 4 — — — — — — —
22 2000 30–16 65.2% #20 1,900 0 6 — — — — — — —
23 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,763 0 6 — — — — — — —
24 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,717 0 6 2001 0–1 0.0% #367 1,458 0 0
25 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 2004 34–20 63.0% #21 1,886 0 6 2003 5–7 41.7% #215 1,499 0 0
27 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,862 0 6 2004 1–2 33.3% #367 1,480 0 0
28 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,863 0 6 2005 2–2 50.0% #461 1,497 0 0
29 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,906 0 6 2006 1–1 50.0% #694 1,510 0 0
30 2008 22–17 56.4% #38 1,889 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,762 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,722 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #684 1,551 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Frantisek Cermak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 24 15 39 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 41 15 56 73.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 10 15 25 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2003 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 30 14 44 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2005 15 13 28 53.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 2006 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2007 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 221 145 366 60.4% 47 55 102 46.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 35 25 60 58.3% — 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 537/601 of Nicolas Kiefer's and 24/24 of Frantisek Cermak's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Frantisek Cermak
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1995 6/6 4.7 2.3 61.5% 72.6% 51.3% 62.7% 44.1% 64.8% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 11/16 6.1 2.5 52.2% 76.6% 47.8% 53.2% 49.7% 62.7% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 37/42 7.9 3.5 55.2% 77.0% 48.3% 60.5% 52.5% 64.1% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 49/56 6.2 4.7 53.7% 74.8% 47.8% 55.1% 44.4% 62.5% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 56/74 6.6 4.3 51.5% 75.7% 53.2% 61.8% 43.5% 64.7% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 38/46 6.4 4.3 52.7% 74.9% 52.3% 61.7% 48.3% 64.3% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 44/51 6.3 4.1 50.3% 71.1% 48.8% 54.0% 50.7% 60.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 40/43 6.2 4.5 52.6% 74.1% 47.8% 58.8% 50.7% 61.5% 37.6% 2001 1/1 2.0 3.0 68.6% 58.3% 36.4% 50.0% 100.0% 51.4% 40.0%
25 2003 36/36 6.5 3.8 50.8% 73.1% 49.9% 58.1% 44.7% 61.8% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 51/54 7.3 3.8 54.9% 77.8% 48.4% 61.1% 41.4% 64.5% 38.7% 2003 12/12 3.1 2.0 58.5% 66.4% 49.1% 49.6% 52.1% 58.6% 40.2%
27 2005 52/53 7.6 3.8 53.4% 74.2% 51.4% 56.4% 51.3% 63.6% 40.9% 2004 3/3 5.0 3.3 63.0% 72.7% 47.1% 40.8% 28.2% 63.2% 35.3%
28 2006 21/22 7.4 4.0 51.7% 72.0% 50.1% 59.5% 43.3% 61.3% 40.2% 2005 4/4 4.3 5.0 60.8% 70.6% 46.9% 74.6% 41.6% 61.2% 39.6%
29 2007 30/31 6.7 2.5 57.0% 79.9% 51.6% 64.6% 33.9% 67.8% 38.1% 2006 2/2 3.5 5.0 52.8% 58.2% 44.1% 27.8% 25.0% 51.5% 35.7%
30 2008 34/39 7.2 2.4 53.6% 76.3% 51.9% 55.4% 44.9% 64.9% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 28/28 7.7 3.9 52.0% 75.0% 47.3% 62.9% 45.8% 61.9% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 4/4 11.3 6.5 51.8% 77.7% 47.3% 55.7% 31.0% 63.0% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 1.5 6.0 50.0% 63.1% 37.5% 52.1% 50.0% 48.1% 27.3%
Career — 537/602 6.9 3.8 53.1% 75.1% 49.9% 58.9% 46.0% 63.3% 38.9% — 24/24 3.4 3.3 58.7% 66.6% 46.5% 51.1% 46.9% 57.8% 38.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Frantisek Cermak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1489 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1528 117.0 +1.19 -1.22 1.032 51.3% +26 — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1563 122.9 +0.33 +1.12 1.067 50.9% +8 -24 — 44.1% +0.09 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1799 139.8 +1.52 -0.54 1.021 50.8% -25 -229 -48 55.6% +0.30 14–3 (82%) 8–7 (53%) 112.8 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1792 151.1 +0.77 +1.69 1.039 50.9% +29 -161 -60 55.6% +0.37 10–11 (48%) 12–8 (60%) 100.3 -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 1923 157.7 +2.57 +3.33 1.144 52.6% +23 -302 -126 65.4% +0.99 15–6 (71%) 16–8 (67%) 110.9 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1900 146.0 +2.09 +2.25 1.124 52.3% +54 -332 -120 61.3% +0.85 9–2 (82%) 7–6 (54%) 104.4 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 1763 149.2 -1.17 +2.22 1.001 50.2% +25 -132 +43 53.5% +0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 97.2 -2.55 2000 1491 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 1718 142.5 -0.77 +1.14 0.977 49.8% +5 -139 +119 46.5% -0.05 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.4 -0.90 2001 1459 97.6 +0.67 -0.76 0.824 47.3% — — — — — — — — -0.06
25 2003 1727 134.5 +0.10 +0.13 0.980 49.8% +22 -144 +93 48.1% -0.22 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) 106.1 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 1887 148.7 +1.38 +2.62 1.092 51.5% +33 -284 -100 60.2% +0.52 12–6 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 109.1 +0.23 2003 1500 112.1 -1.87 +0.62 0.970 49.6% — +57 — 40.0% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 -0.08
27 2005 1862 154.9 +1.31 +3.44 1.125 52.2% +10 -139 -50 60.9% +0.77 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 100.4 -1.12 2004 1480 100.0 -1.01 -3.47 0.958 49.0% — +70 — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–0 — +0.19
28 2006 1863 140.5 -0.75 +2.34 1.039 50.6% +65 -104 — 60.0% +0.60 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +0.78 2005 1498 107.4 +0.14 +1.24 1.022 50.6% — +70 — 50.0% +0.30 1–1 0–2 — -0.16
29 2007 1907 153.1 +4.21 +1.95 1.186 52.7% +55 — -153 65.2% +0.94 1–1 8–5 (62%) — -1.12 2006 1511 104.1 -1.92 -0.20 0.737 43.4% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — -0.08
30 2008 1889 153.4 +2.15 +3.22 1.128 51.9% +5 -79 -37 57.0% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) 102.3 -1.13 2007 1497 113.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1762 145.0 -1.02 -0.24 0.930 49.3% +63 +45 +54 48.5% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 99.1 -1.73 2008 1469 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1722 106.1 +0.99 -2.77 0.774 46.3% — — +51 27.3% -1.09 1–1 0–1 — -0.60 2009 1508 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1552 98.3 -2.77 -2.45 0.526 38.2% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.26
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1481 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1489 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1454 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1428 91.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1406 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1995 155.1 +1.02 +1.86 1.060 51.2% +25 -127 -17 56.7% +0.45 106–67 (61%) 107–77 (58%) 111.9 -1.01 — 1567 103.4 -1.40 -0.17 0.902 48.1% — +63 — 39.2% -0.59 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.8 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.