H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Kiefer vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 3-0

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 3–0 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 1999 Canada Masters third round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 5, 1999* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #17 6-4 6-0 Guillaume Raoux #79 Match data
Jan 28, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #29 6-3 6-4 7-5 Guillaume Raoux #46 Match data
Sep 27, 1997* Toulouse ATP 250 QF Hard Nicolas Kiefer #71 6-2 6-7(2) 7-5 Guillaume Raoux #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,806 175 222 44.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Guillaume Raoux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,492 0 0
19 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0
20 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0
21 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,615 0 0
22 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1
23 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1
24 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,572 0 1
25 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,566 0 1
26 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6 1996 21–21 50.0% #72 1,630 0 1
27 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1
28 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1
29 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,577 0 1
30 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1
31 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6 — — — — — — —