H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nicolas Kiefer vs Jason Stoltenberg H2H: 2-0
Nicolas Kiefer holds a 2–0 lead over Jason Stoltenberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2000 Hong Kong fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2000* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 6-2 | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-4 6-3 1-6 4-6 6-3 | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jason Stoltenberg | #556 | #19 | 1,299 | 1,923 | 294 | 259 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Kiefer | Jason Stoltenberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #413 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #84 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #108 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #168 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #80 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #31 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #79 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #27 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #66 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |