H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Nicolas Kiefer vs Juan Balcells H2H: 1-1
Nicolas Kiefer and Juan Balcells are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Juan Balcells leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2002 Wimbledon first round 6-3 2-6 5-7 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 2-6 5-7 7-5 6-3 | Juan Balcells | Match data |
| May 30, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Juan Balcells | 6-2 1-6 4-6 6-3 8-6 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Juan Balcells | #869 | #57 | 733 | 1,733 | 38 | 46 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nicolas Kiefer | Juan Balcells | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #228 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #216 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #71 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |