H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nicolas Kiefer vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Kiefer holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2009 Stuttgart quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2009* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-2 6-1 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nicolas Kiefer | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |