H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Kiefer vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-2
Martin Damm Sr holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 1999 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Martin Damm Sr | 7-5 6-4 6-2 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1999* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1996* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Martin Damm Sr | 6-3 6-4 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,744 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nicolas Kiefer | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |