H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC
Martin Damm Sr holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 1999 Roland Garros round of 128 7-5 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Damm Sr | 7-5 6-4 6-2 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data | May 26, 1999* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Jan 14, 1999* | R32 | Sydney International | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Martin Damm Sr | 6-3 6-4 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data | Jan 5, 1996* | R16 | Adelaide International | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,995 | 347 | 255 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nicolas Kiefer | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,922 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #21 | 1,886 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,862 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,906 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,762 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,722 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Nicolas Kiefer | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1997 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1998 | 24 | 15 | 39 | 61.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1999 | 41 | 15 | 56 | 73.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 2000 | 27 | 11 | 38 | 71.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 2001 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 2002 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 2003 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 2004 | 30 | 14 | 44 | 68.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 2005 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2006 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 221 | 145 | 366 | 60.4% | 47 | 55 | 102 | 46.1% | 44 | 30 | 74 | 59.5% | 35 | 25 | 60 | 58.3% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Nicolas Kiefer | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1994 | 1489 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.05 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1995 | 1528 | 117.0 | +1.19 | -1.22 | 1.032 | 51.3% | +26 | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.08 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1996 | 1563 | 122.9 | +0.33 | +1.12 | 1.067 | 50.9% | +8 | -24 | — | 44.1% | +0.09 | 0–1 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.80 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 1997 | 1799 | 139.8 | +1.52 | -0.54 | 1.021 | 50.8% | -25 | -229 | -48 | 55.6% | +0.30 | 14–3 (82%) | 8–7 (53%) | 112.8 | +0.64 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -88 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.3 | +0.26 |
| 1998 | 1792 | 151.1 | +0.77 | +1.69 | 1.039 | 50.9% | +29 | -161 | -60 | 55.6% | +0.37 | 10–11 (48%) | 12–8 (60%) | 100.3 | -0.30 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | +0.61 |
| 1999 | 1923 | 157.7 | +2.57 | +3.33 | 1.144 | 52.6% | +23 | -302 | -126 | 65.4% | +0.99 | 15–6 (71%) | 16–8 (67%) | 110.9 | +0.49 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.4 | -0.61 |
| 2000 | 1900 | 146.0 | +2.09 | +2.25 | 1.124 | 52.3% | +54 | -332 | -120 | 61.3% | +0.85 | 9–2 (82%) | 7–6 (54%) | 104.4 | -0.03 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.9 | -0.27 |
| 2001 | 1763 | 149.2 | -1.17 | +2.22 | 1.001 | 50.2% | +25 | -132 | +43 | 53.5% | +0.24 | 6–10 (38%) | 7–5 (58%) | 97.2 | -2.55 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | 102.9 | +1.26 |
| 2002 | 1718 | 142.5 | -0.77 | +1.14 | 0.977 | 49.8% | +5 | -139 | +119 | 46.5% | -0.05 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–7 (36%) | 98.4 | -0.90 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | 105.2 | +0.62 |
| 2003 | 1727 | 134.5 | +0.10 | +0.13 | 0.980 | 49.8% | +22 | -144 | +93 | 48.1% | -0.22 | 6–1 (86%) | 3–3 (50%) | 106.1 | +0.36 | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.6 | -0.31 |
| 2004 | 1887 | 148.7 | +1.38 | +2.62 | 1.092 | 51.5% | +33 | -284 | -100 | 60.2% | +0.52 | 12–6 (67%) | 14–7 (67%) | 109.1 | +0.23 | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | 90.9 | -0.57 |
| 2005 | 1862 | 154.9 | +1.31 | +3.44 | 1.125 | 52.2% | +10 | -139 | -50 | 60.9% | +0.77 | 8–8 (50%) | 7–5 (58%) | 100.4 | -1.12 | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | +0.30 |
| 2006 | 1863 | 140.5 | -0.75 | +2.34 | 1.039 | 50.6% | +65 | -104 | — | 60.0% | +0.60 | 8–3 (73%) | 7–4 (64%) | 106.1 | +0.78 | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| 2007 | 1907 | 153.1 | +4.21 | +1.95 | 1.186 | 52.7% | +55 | — | -153 | 65.2% | +0.94 | 1–1 | 8–5 (62%) | — | -1.12 | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 2008 | 1889 | 153.4 | +2.15 | +3.22 | 1.128 | 51.9% | +5 | -79 | -37 | 57.0% | +0.37 | 7–5 (58%) | 7–4 (64%) | 102.3 | -1.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1762 | 145.0 | -1.02 | -0.24 | 0.930 | 49.3% | +63 | +45 | +54 | 48.5% | -0.09 | 4–4 (50%) | 5–4 (56%) | 99.1 | -1.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1722 | 106.1 | +0.99 | -2.77 | 0.774 | 46.3% | — | — | +51 | 27.3% | -1.09 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1995 | 155.1 | +1.02 | +1.86 | 1.060 | 51.2% | +25 | -127 | -17 | 56.7% | +0.45 | 106–67 (61%) | 107–77 (58%) | 111.9 | -1.01 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | 101.6 | +0.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 3 | 12 | 15 | Mar 30, 2009 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 6 | 8 | 14 | Oct 23, 2003 | H2H |
| Fabrice Santoro | 3 | 7 | 10 | Jun 24, 2009 | H2H |
| Jonas Bjorkman | 6 | 4 | 10 | Jun 11, 2004 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 7 | 3 | 10 | Feb 21, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |