H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Kiefer vs Michael Llodra H2H: 3-0
Nicolas Kiefer holds a 3–0 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2009 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2008* | Halle | ATP 500 | QF | Grass | Nicolas Kiefer | 4-0 (ret.) | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2006* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Kiefer | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Kiefer | Michael Llodra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |