H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Kiefer vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 2-2
Nicolas Kiefer and Radek Stepanek are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2007 Los Angeles semifinal W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2007* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Radek Stepanek | (w/o) | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 4-6 4-6 6-4 6-3 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2003* | Halle | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Nicolas Kiefer | 7-5 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| May 3, 2002* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Radek Stepanek | 6-2 6-2 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Kiefer | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |