H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Nicolas Kiefer vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 2-3

Richard Krajicek holds a 3–2 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2000 Halle quarterfinal 7-5 5-7 7-6(3).

GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2000* Halle ATP 250 QF Grass Richard Krajicek #32 7-5 5-7 7-6(3) Nicolas Kiefer #13 Match data
Oct 16, 1999* Vienna ATP 250 SF Hard Nicolas Kiefer #11 7-6(9) 6-4 Richard Krajicek #8 Match data
May 13, 1999* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Kiefer #23 6-3 6-2 Richard Krajicek #5 Match data
Feb 26, 1999* London ATP 250 R16 Carpet Richard Krajicek #9 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #35 Match data
Jun 28, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Richard Krajicek #14 6-4 7-6(2) 7-6(4) Nicolas Kiefer #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
29 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17
32 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6