H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Kiefer vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 2-0

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 2–0 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 1999 Halle Open round of 16 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Kiefer #21 6-1 6-4 Richey Reneberg #286 Match data Jun 11, 1999* R16 Halle Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Nicolas Kiefer #68 7-5 6-3 Richey Reneberg #54 Match data Jul 11, 1997* R16 Swiss Open Gstaad World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,995 347 255 57.6% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,920 305 262 53.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Richey Reneberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,799 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,792 0 1 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0
21 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,922 0 4 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0
22 2000 30–16 65.2% #20 1,900 0 6 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,676 0 0
23 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,763 0 6 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,690 0 0
24 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,717 0 6 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0
25 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,801 0 1
26 2004 34–20 63.0% #21 1,886 0 6 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1
27 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,862 0 6 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,756 0 2
28 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,863 0 6 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2
29 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,906 0 6 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,775 0 2
30 2008 22–17 56.4% #38 1,889 0 6 1996 37–25 59.7% #32 1,799 0 3
31 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,762 0 6 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,680 0 3
32 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,722 0 6 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,595 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,625 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,630 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Richey Reneberg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 24 15 39 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1999 41 15 56 73.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2000 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1988 4 8 12 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
23 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 17 10 27 63.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
24 2002 10 15 25 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 20 13 33 60.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 2003 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2004 30 14 44 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1992 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2005 15 13 28 53.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1993 26 13 39 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 2006 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 2007 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1995 11 14 25 44.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1996 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 221 145 366 60.4% 47 55 102 46.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 35 25 60 58.3% — 171 140 311 55.0% 43 43 86 50.0% 39 29 68 57.4% 52 50 102 51.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 537/601 of Nicolas Kiefer's and 342/395 of Richey Reneberg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Richey Reneberg
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1995 6/6 4.7 2.3 61.5% 72.6% 51.3% 62.7% 44.1% 64.8% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 11/16 6.1 2.5 52.2% 76.6% 47.8% 53.2% 49.7% 62.7% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 37/42 7.9 3.5 55.2% 77.0% 48.3% 60.5% 52.5% 64.1% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 49/56 6.2 4.7 53.7% 74.8% 47.8% 55.1% 44.4% 62.5% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 56/74 6.6 4.3 51.5% 75.7% 53.2% 61.8% 43.5% 64.7% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 38/46 6.4 4.3 52.7% 74.9% 52.3% 61.7% 48.3% 64.3% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 44/51 6.3 4.1 50.3% 71.1% 48.8% 54.0% 50.7% 60.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 40/43 6.2 4.5 52.6% 74.1% 47.8% 58.8% 50.7% 61.5% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 36/36 6.5 3.8 50.8% 73.1% 49.9% 58.1% 44.7% 61.8% 37.4% 1991 44/50 3.7 2.9 58.8% 69.8% 50.2% 57.7% 46.9% 61.5% 40.0%
26 2004 51/54 7.3 3.8 54.9% 77.8% 48.4% 61.1% 41.4% 64.5% 38.7% 1992 35/38 4.0 3.0 56.6% 71.6% 49.4% 58.4% 41.5% 61.9% 37.3%
27 2005 52/53 7.6 3.8 53.4% 74.2% 51.4% 56.4% 51.3% 63.6% 40.9% 1993 57/63 4.2 2.1 54.4% 72.8% 53.8% 57.1% 47.2% 64.1% 42.2%
28 2006 21/22 7.4 4.0 51.7% 72.0% 50.1% 59.5% 43.3% 61.3% 40.2% 1994 51/57 4.6 2.4 54.5% 71.7% 53.1% 53.9% 45.2% 62.8% 41.3%
29 2007 30/31 6.7 2.5 57.0% 79.9% 51.6% 64.6% 33.9% 67.8% 38.1% 1995 38/45 5.3 3.0 52.5% 71.3% 51.5% 58.0% 36.8% 62.0% 37.5%
30 2008 34/39 7.2 2.4 53.6% 76.3% 51.9% 55.4% 44.9% 64.9% 39.6% 1996 52/62 4.9 2.5 54.6% 72.9% 53.0% 62.6% 51.7% 63.7% 40.3%
31 2009 28/28 7.7 3.9 52.0% 75.0% 47.3% 62.9% 45.8% 61.9% 35.4% 1997 29/38 5.2 2.4 55.9% 72.4% 52.2% 58.1% 37.2% 63.5% 35.8%
32 2010 4/4 11.3 6.5 51.8% 77.7% 47.3% 55.7% 31.0% 63.0% 28.6% 1998 21/25 5.8 3.7 56.8% 69.4% 48.4% 60.7% 38.8% 60.4% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 13/15 6.3 3.3 55.6% 72.8% 47.9% 46.8% 39.5% 61.8% 38.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 2.5 0.5 48.7% 69.0% 50.6% 64.3% 33.3% 59.6% 40.8%
Career — 537/602 6.9 3.8 53.1% 75.1% 49.9% 58.9% 46.0% 63.3% 38.9% — 342/567 4.6 2.7 55.3% 71.7% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1% 62.7% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Richey Reneberg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1489 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1528 117.0 +1.19 -1.22 1.032 51.3% +26 — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1563 122.9 +0.33 +1.12 1.067 50.9% +8 -24 — 44.1% +0.09 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1799 139.8 +1.52 -0.54 1.021 50.8% -25 -229 -48 55.6% +0.30 14–3 (82%) 8–7 (53%) 112.8 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1792 151.1 +0.77 +1.69 1.039 50.9% +29 -161 -60 55.6% +0.37 10–11 (48%) 12–8 (60%) 100.3 -0.30 1986 1512 107.9 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -0.33 2–0 0–1 — +0.23
21 1999 1923 157.7 +2.57 +3.33 1.144 52.6% +23 -302 -126 65.4% +0.99 15–6 (71%) 16–8 (67%) 110.9 +0.49 1987 1672 145.5 — — — — -22 -111 -30 54.2% +0.40 2–4 (33%) 6–10 (38%) 100.4 -1.09
22 2000 1900 146.0 +2.09 +2.25 1.124 52.3% +54 -332 -120 61.3% +0.85 9–2 (82%) 7–6 (54%) 104.4 -0.03 1988 1677 138.5 — — — — -20 -76 -41 45.5% -0.19 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) 91.9 -2.96
23 2001 1763 149.2 -1.17 +2.22 1.001 50.2% +25 -132 +43 53.5% +0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 97.2 -2.55 1989 1691 146.0 — — — — +32 -131 -6 52.6% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 8–6 (57%) 99.7 -2.41
24 2002 1718 142.5 -0.77 +1.14 0.977 49.8% +5 -139 +119 46.5% -0.05 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.4 -0.90 1990 1822 152.0 — — — — +35 -278 -123 56.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 9–9 (50%) 103.8 -0.36
25 2003 1727 134.5 +0.10 +0.13 0.980 49.8% +22 -144 +93 48.1% -0.22 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) 106.1 +0.36 1991 1801 136.9 +1.06 +1.57 1.040 50.8% +19 -158 -128 56.7% +0.32 16–7 (70%) 18–10 (64%) 108.7 +1.77
26 2004 1887 148.7 +1.38 +2.62 1.092 51.5% +33 -284 -100 60.2% +0.52 12–6 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 109.1 +0.23 1992 1712 137.1 +0.01 -0.27 0.979 49.4% +15 — -40 50.0% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 9–4 (69%) 101.0 +0.14
27 2005 1862 154.9 +1.31 +3.44 1.125 52.2% +10 -139 -50 60.9% +0.77 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 100.4 -1.12 1993 1757 149.2 +1.89 +3.46 1.174 52.9% +20 -183 -68 58.3% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +0.80
28 2006 1863 140.5 -0.75 +2.34 1.039 50.6% +65 -104 — 60.0% +0.60 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +0.78 1994 1810 145.9 +1.16 +3.35 1.110 51.8% +16 -205 -128 57.6% +0.59 8–10 (44%) 11–5 (69%) 101.8 -0.33
29 2007 1907 153.1 +4.21 +1.95 1.186 52.7% +55 — -153 65.2% +0.94 1–1 8–5 (62%) — -1.12 1995 1775 141.8 +0.54 +0.52 0.988 49.5% +7 -140 -93 49.1% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -2.47
30 2008 1889 153.4 +2.15 +3.22 1.128 51.9% +5 -79 -37 57.0% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) 102.3 -1.13 1996 1800 153.8 +1.89 +2.79 1.110 51.9% -7 -121 +20 55.6% +0.52 14–8 (64%) 12–12 (50%) 103.0 -3.44
31 2009 1762 145.0 -1.02 -0.24 0.930 49.3% +63 +45 +54 48.5% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 99.1 -1.73 1997 1681 138.4 +1.16 -0.37 0.980 49.5% +6 -19 +159 48.9% -0.08 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.18
32 2010 1722 106.1 +0.99 -2.77 0.774 46.3% — — +51 27.3% -1.09 1–1 0–1 — -0.60 1998 1596 119.7 -1.25 -0.80 0.936 48.8% +52 +19 +180 43.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 99.0 +1.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1626 124.0 -0.07 +0.69 1.005 50.3% +16 — +87 44.7% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 95.8 -0.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1630 106.1 0.00 -0.50 1.009 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.10
Career — 1995 155.1 +1.02 +1.86 1.060 51.2% +25 -127 -17 56.7% +0.45 106–67 (61%) 107–77 (58%) 111.9 -1.01 — 1920 150.0 +0.99 +1.68 1.057 50.9% +15 -127 -13 52.9% +0.28 92–89 (51%) 107–97 (52%) 102.3 -1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.