H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Kiefer vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 2-3

Thomas Johansson holds a 3–2 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2005 St. Petersburg final 6-4 6-2.

GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 30, 2005* St. Petersburg ATP 250 F Carpet Thomas Johansson #15 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #29 Match data
Sep 5, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #20 6-4 6-0 6-1 Thomas Johansson #61 Match data
Jun 23, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Thomas Johansson #123 4-6 4-6 6-4 6-3 6-0 Nicolas Kiefer #33 Match data
Aug 8, 1999* Canada Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Thomas Johansson #22 4-6 6-1 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #17 Match data
Oct 22, 1997* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Nicolas Kiefer #34 6-3 3-6 6-1 Thomas Johansson #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 336 277 54.8% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Kiefer Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #422 1,535 0 0
19 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,492 0 0
21 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,699 0 2
23 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,899 0 2
24 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,725 0 3
25 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6 2000 22–25 46.8% #39 1,825 0 4
26 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,746 1 7
28 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,855 1 8
30 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,723 1 9
32 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,759 1 9
33 2008 11–17 39.3% #136 1,673 1 9