H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Nicolas Kiefer vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 2-3

Vincent Spadea holds a 3–2 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Vincent Spadea leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2007 US Open first round 6-2 7-6(1) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Vincent Spadea
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #187 6-2 7-6(1) 6-3 Vincent Spadea #62 Match data
Mar 7, 2004* Scottsdale ATP 250 F Hard Vincent Spadea #29 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #46 Match data
Aug 2, 2003* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Nicolas Kiefer #75 1-6 7-5 6-3 Vincent Spadea #31 Match data
Mar 13, 2003* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Vincent Spadea #56 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #76 Match data
Jan 8, 1998* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Vincent Spadea #88 6-3 4-6 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 310 348 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Nicolas Kiefer Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,483 0 0
1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,752 0 0
2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6 2000 3–23 11.5% #213 1,545 0 0
2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,534 0 0
2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,623 0 0
2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6 2004 39–25 60.9% #20 1,784 0 1
2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,627 0 1
2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,650 0 1
2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,657 0 1
2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,526 0 1
— — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,480 0 1