H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 4-2

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 4–2 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 4–2 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2003 Buenos Aires third round 6-4 6-1.

ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
ITA Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 2003* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #38 6-4 6-1 Andrea Gaudenzi #115 Match data
Jul 18, 2002* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #21 7-6(1) 2-6 6-4 Andrea Gaudenzi #105 Match data
Jul 10, 1999* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Nicolas Lapentti #26 7-5 6-3 Andrea Gaudenzi #89 Match data
Apr 21, 1999* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #41 6-1 7-6(1) Andrea Gaudenzi #115 Match data
Aug 1, 1998* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Andrea Gaudenzi #36 6-3 7-6(5) Nicolas Lapentti #61 Match data
Sep 27, 1997* Bucharest ATP 250 QF Clay Andrea Gaudenzi #84 6-2 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,865 204 220 48.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,773 0 0
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,680 0 0
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 1996 24–26 48.0% #55 1,654 0 0
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,640 0 0
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,677 0 1
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,645 0 1
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,592 0 1
27 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,693 0 3
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5