H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Andrei Medvedev H2H: 1-2
Andrei Medvedev holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andrei Medvedev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-3 5-7 6-7(2) 6-4 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-3 5-7 6-7(2) 6-4 8-6 | Andrei Medvedev | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1998* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andrei Medvedev | 6-1 6-4 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andrei Medvedev | 6-2 6-2 6-3 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Lapentti | Andrei Medvedev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |