H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 0-1
Andrei Olhovskiy holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics second round 6-1 3-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1996* | Atlanta Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Andrei Olhovskiy | 6-1 3-6 8-6 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,933 | 282 | 283 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,731 | 116 | 163 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Lapentti | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #121 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,587 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,575 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,680 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,610 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #90 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,492 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,667 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,481 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,581 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |