H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Andrew Ilie H2H: 2-0

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 2–0 lead over Andrew Ilie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2000 Scottsdale round of 32 1-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 50 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Andrew Ilie
AUS Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Lapentti #8 1-6 6-2 6-3 Andrew Ilie #75 Match data Mar 9, 2000* R32 Scottsdale ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Nicolas Lapentti #91 6-4 6-2 4-6 6-2 Andrew Ilie #63 Match data Jan 27, 1999* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,933 282 283 49.9% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Andrew Ilie #856 #38 997 1,739 89 115 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Andrew Ilie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 11–20 35.5% #121 1,568 0 1 1995 5–5 50.0% #161 1,551 0 0
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,658 0 1 1996 1–3 25.0% #346 1,540 0 0
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,595 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 1998 14–14 50.0% #59 1,587 0 1
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,750 0 3 1999 28–29 49.1% #54 1,638 0 1
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,835 0 4 2000 21–27 43.8% #50 1,591 0 2
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,713 0 5 2001 20–28 41.7% #66 1,620 0 2
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,696 0 5 2002 0–7 0.0% #464 1,500 0 2
27 2004 7–15 31.8% #122 1,587 0 5 2003 0–2 0.0% #384 1,456 0 2
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,575 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,680 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,610 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2008 14–18 43.8% #86 1,650 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,667 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,581 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Andrew Ilie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
20 1997 3 6 9 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1998 4 11 15 26.7% 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2000 23 15 38 60.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 18 15 33 54.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2000 7 18 25 28.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2002 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 11 15 26 42.3% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2002 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 5 6 11 45.5% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 3 5 8 37.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 4 6 10 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 100 114 214 46.7% 154 136 290 53.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 18 17 35 51.4% — 41 64 105 39.0% 42 35 77 54.5% 5 11 16 31.2% 1 5 6 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 490/565 of Nicolas Lapentti's and 172/204 of Andrew Ilie's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Andrew Ilie
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1995 3/5 6.3 2.7 62.2% 77.3% 59.8% 64.6% 47.2% 70.1% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 25/31 3.8 3.4 56.2% 67.4% 47.9% 49.9% 41.1% 58.8% 37.9% 1995 7/10 3.6 4.4 54.0% 63.9% 51.5% 60.4% 34.1% 58.2% 37.9%
20 1997 32/35 4.4 2.8 60.4% 71.2% 48.1% 56.0% 46.1% 61.9% 40.2% 1996 4/4 3.5 4.3 51.6% 68.5% 44.3% 68.4% 33.4% 57.1% 39.9%
21 1998 40/45 3.4 3.8 63.2% 67.2% 44.6% 49.7% 42.8% 58.7% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 59/76 5.3 2.4 61.7% 72.0% 50.2% 64.0% 40.2% 63.5% 40.7% 1998 25/28 3.8 3.4 49.8% 70.9% 51.6% 57.8% 44.9% 61.2% 36.6%
23 2000 53/68 6.3 3.4 57.6% 72.3% 49.1% 61.4% 43.9% 62.4% 38.6% 1999 50/57 4.6 3.2 54.8% 68.1% 51.6% 60.3% 40.2% 60.7% 36.3%
24 2001 38/52 5.7 3.2 56.1% 74.4% 47.9% 57.3% 41.7% 62.8% 38.8% 2000 41/48 5.8 3.5 52.8% 70.0% 49.0% 56.3% 36.5% 59.9% 37.3%
25 2002 49/59 6.6 2.6 59.0% 73.4% 49.0% 49.6% 35.4% 63.3% 38.5% 2001 38/48 4.8 3.1 56.3% 68.1% 49.7% 53.6% 38.7% 59.8% 34.5%
26 2003 41/42 4.9 2.2 61.5% 69.0% 50.1% 56.3% 40.4% 61.7% 36.8% 2002 5/7 3.4 4.8 57.3% 65.0% 40.5% 51.3% 16.2% 54.7% 33.3%
27 2004 21/22 4.1 2.3 58.4% 68.7% 52.6% 56.8% 36.5% 62.0% 35.6% 2003 2/2 7.0 4.0 59.3% 63.1% 33.3% 21.4% 20.0% 50.9% 25.0%
28 2005 25/25 3.2 1.6 64.4% 68.8% 50.2% 52.2% 32.3% 62.2% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 21/21 3.5 1.4 63.2% 68.6% 45.4% 60.5% 42.1% 60.2% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 24/24 4.3 2.3 60.5% 68.8% 44.7% 57.7% 37.1% 59.0% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 31/32 3.2 2.0 62.5% 68.6% 50.4% 50.4% 43.5% 61.9% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 20/20 4.4 2.7 60.2% 66.9% 49.5% 55.4% 40.2% 60.0% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 8/8 1.6 2.3 53.8% 62.6% 45.5% 40.0% 35.4% 54.9% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 490/565 4.7 2.7 60.2% 70.3% 48.7% 55.7% 40.4% 61.6% 38.0% — 172/204 4.7 3.4 53.9% 68.6% 49.8% 57.0% 38.3% 59.9% 36.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Andrew Ilie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1595 115.3 +3.11 +1.13 1.285 52.9% — +53 — 83.3% +1.67 2–0 1–1 — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1569 122.4 -2.38 -0.82 0.920 48.4% -108 +97 +28 40.5% -0.77 7–8 (47%) 12–6 (67%) — +0.89 1995 1552 112.5 -0.36 -0.54 0.906 48.1% — +56 — 46.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.53
20 1997 1659 129.3 +0.24 +1.23 1.054 50.8% -156 +64 — 45.0% -0.14 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.41 1996 1541 104.9 +0.54 -0.28 0.931 49.0% — — — 33.3% -1.25 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.31
21 1998 1595 132.1 -1.83 +0.31 0.932 48.6% -86 +85 — 40.4% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1883 154.4 +1.96 +3.11 1.116 52.2% -43 -24 — 59.3% +0.58 22–7 (76%) 17–14 (55%) — -1.12 1998 1587 129.4 +0.09 -1.09 0.944 49.1% -70 +132 — 50.7% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.29
23 2000 1751 142.0 +0.96 +0.97 1.026 50.6% +22 +87 -251 53.7% +0.39 16–5 (76%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.98 1999 1638 126.6 -1.25 -1.32 0.922 48.8% +2 +8 -9 48.0% -0.28 12–8 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — +2.44
24 2001 1836 155.3 +1.70 +1.34 1.041 50.6% -27 +112 — 55.1% +0.40 10–5 (67%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.27 2000 1592 131.0 -1.56 -0.90 0.931 48.9% -49 +205 -39 48.3% -0.32 5–10 (33%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.35
25 2002 1713 133.6 +1.50 +0.61 1.049 50.5% +6 +68 -121 50.6% +0.13 18–9 (67%) 13–13 (50%) — +1.94 2001 1621 131.7 -1.47 -2.30 0.859 47.6% -4 +65 — 43.0% -0.56 10–9 (53%) 11–10 (52%) — -1.52
26 2003 1697 131.8 -0.81 -0.35 0.961 49.4% -25 +79 — 48.2% -0.17 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.89 2002 1501 90.4 -3.88 -1.57 0.735 44.2% +40 — — 5.9% -3.12 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.68
27 2004 1588 121.8 -0.38 -0.79 0.938 48.5% +44 +67 — 38.0% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.01 2003 1456 95.5 -2.41 -1.74 0.509 37.7% — — — 16.7% -2.17 — 0–1 — +0.16
28 2005 1575 129.8 -0.05 -0.90 0.948 48.9% -6 +95 — 37.5% -0.70 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1681 124.7 -1.29 +2.41 1.042 50.7% — +73 — 52.7% +0.05 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1611 123.4 -2.74 -2.10 0.829 47.0% -49 +93 -16 38.3% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1650 136.2 -0.69 -0.13 0.944 48.9% -103 +132 — 48.1% -0.15 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1667 132.7 -1.19 +0.26 0.902 48.2% -65 +134 — 40.7% -0.64 5–8 (38%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1581 117.8 -2.88 -0.42 0.762 44.8% +18 +71 — 26.3% -1.74 0–2 0–1 — -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1934 143.0 -0.03 +0.60 0.990 49.8% -30 +76 -105 48.7% -0.07 114–88 (56%) 108–103 (51%) 107.5 +0.25 — 1739 129.5 -1.19 -1.36 0.901 48.3% -21 +97 -17 45.1% -0.47 33–33 (50%) 40–37 (52%) 103.7 +0.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.