H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 0-2
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1998 Gstaad third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1998* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Cedric Pioline | 6-4 6-4 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-0 6-4 6-2 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Lapentti | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |