H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 2-2

Nicolas Lapentti and Fabrice Santoro are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2007 Moscow third round 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2007* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #113 3-6 6-3 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #37 Match data
Nov 4, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Nicolas Lapentti #11 6-3 7-6(5) Fabrice Santoro #38 Match data
Sep 2, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fabrice Santoro #32 4-6 7-5 6-3 3-6 7-6(4) Nicolas Lapentti #56 Match data
Jan 23, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #22 6-4 3-6 3-6 6-2 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6