H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 2-1
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 2–1 lead over Fernando Meligeni in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2002 Munich fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2002* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-4 6-4 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 6-0 6-1 6-3 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1999* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-4 2-6 16-14 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Lapentti | Fernando Meligeni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |