H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 4-1

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 4–1 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2002 Basel third round 6-3 6-2.

ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 24, 2002* Basel ATP 250 R32 Carpet Nicolas Lapentti #29 6-3 6-2 Fernando Vicente #56 Match data
May 26, 2002* St. Poelten ATP 250 F Clay Nicolas Lapentti #31 7-5 6-4 Fernando Vicente #71 Match data
Jul 31, 1999* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Fernando Vicente #57 6-7(4) 6-1 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #20 Match data
Jul 30, 1998* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #61 6-4 6-1 Fernando Vicente #74 Match data
May 2, 1998* Prague ATP 250 QF Clay Nicolas Lapentti #64 6-0 7-5 Fernando Vicente #120 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Fernando Vicente #1,019 #29 993 1,762 158 212 42.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Fernando Vicente
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1 1996 3–3 50.0% #151 1,548 0 0
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1 1997 9–12 42.9% #121 1,570 0 0
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1 1998 20–20 50.0% #54 1,655 0 0
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 1999 25–29 46.3% #49 1,638 0 1
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3 2000 23–31 42.6% #47 1,615 0 2
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4 2001 23–26 46.9% #52 1,637 0 3
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5 2002 23–28 45.1% #58 1,618 0 3
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5 2003 20–29 40.8% #63 1,600 0 3
27 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5 2004 4–5 44.4% #187 1,593 0 3
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5 2005 3–5 37.5% #110 1,614 0 3
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5 2006 5–17 22.7% #111 1,461 0 3
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5 2007 0–5 0.0% #168 1,508 0 3
31 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5 2008 0–1 0.0% #206 1,484 0 3
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5 2009 0–1 0.0% #420 1,489 0 3
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5