H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs George Bastl H2H: 1-0

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 1–0 lead over George Bastl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2000 Shanghai Masters round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 50 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
George Bastl
SUI Age 51 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
George Bastl #142 6-3 7-6(11) Nicolas Lapentti #111 Match data Aug 29, 2006* Q3 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard
Nicolas Lapentti #15 6-3 6-2 George Bastl #93 Match data Oct 20, 2000* R16 Shanghai Masters ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,933 282 283 49.9% 0 0 0 2 3 5
George Bastl #953 #71 569 1,656 47 85 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti George Bastl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 11–20 35.5% #121 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,595 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,750 0 3 1998 1–3 25.0% #194 1,501 0 0
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,835 0 4 1999 6–7 46.2% #81 1,558 0 0
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,713 0 5 2000 15–22 40.5% #105 1,611 0 0
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,696 0 5 2001 10–15 40.0% #115 1,622 0 0
27 2004 7–15 31.8% #122 1,587 0 5 2002 3–9 25.0% #160 1,564 0 0
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,575 0 5 2003 0–3 0.0% #277 1,499 0 0
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,680 0 5 2004 0–1 0.0% #201 1,490 0 0
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,610 0 5 2005 4–7 36.4% #128 1,564 0 0
31 2008 14–18 43.8% #86 1,650 0 5 2006 5–8 38.5% #173 1,588 0 0
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,667 0 5 2007 1–4 20.0% #464 1,522 0 0
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,581 0 5 2008 1–4 20.0% #233 1,619 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #523 1,473 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Lapentti George Bastl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 3 6 9 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 4 11 15 26.7% 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 23 15 38 60.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2002 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2001 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2004 5 6 11 45.5% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2007 3 5 8 37.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2008 4 6 10 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2009 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 100 114 214 46.7% 154 136 290 53.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 18 17 35 51.4% — 37 51 88 42.0% 2 12 14 14.3% 3 13 16 18.8% 5 9 14 35.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 490/565 of Nicolas Lapentti's and 122/132 of George Bastl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Lapentti George Bastl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1995 3/5 6.3 2.7 62.2% 77.3% 59.8% 64.6% 47.2% 70.1% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 25/31 3.8 3.4 56.2% 67.4% 47.9% 49.9% 41.1% 58.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 32/35 4.4 2.8 60.4% 71.2% 48.1% 56.0% 46.1% 61.9% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 40/45 3.4 3.8 63.2% 67.2% 44.6% 49.7% 42.8% 58.7% 38.4% 1996 1/1 4.0 2.0 65.0% 67.3% 53.6% 50.0% 33.3% 62.5% 26.9%
22 1999 59/76 5.3 2.4 61.7% 72.0% 50.2% 64.0% 40.2% 63.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 53/68 6.3 3.4 57.6% 72.3% 49.1% 61.4% 43.9% 62.4% 38.6% 1998 3/4 4.0 3.3 72.6% 63.1% 43.7% 47.1% 30.0% 57.6% 33.1%
24 2001 38/52 5.7 3.2 56.1% 74.4% 47.9% 57.3% 41.7% 62.8% 38.8% 1999 11/13 5.1 3.2 63.5% 68.4% 48.1% 57.2% 41.1% 61.1% 37.7%
25 2002 49/59 6.6 2.6 59.0% 73.4% 49.0% 49.6% 35.4% 63.3% 38.5% 2000 32/37 3.8 2.8 66.2% 63.9% 48.5% 58.5% 37.4% 58.6% 39.3%
26 2003 41/42 4.9 2.2 61.5% 69.0% 50.1% 56.3% 40.4% 61.7% 36.8% 2001 23/25 6.3 1.9 69.0% 64.5% 49.6% 50.3% 44.1% 60.2% 38.5%
27 2004 21/22 4.1 2.3 58.4% 68.7% 52.6% 56.8% 36.5% 62.0% 35.6% 2002 12/12 5.8 5.0 62.9% 67.2% 44.2% 58.8% 27.8% 58.5% 32.7%
28 2005 25/25 3.2 1.6 64.4% 68.8% 50.2% 52.2% 32.3% 62.2% 35.8% 2003 3/3 1.0 1.7 67.6% 64.9% 46.2% 47.8% 33.3% 59.0% 26.5%
29 2006 21/21 3.5 1.4 63.2% 68.6% 45.4% 60.5% 42.1% 60.2% 41.5% 2004 1/1 8.0 2.0 69.4% 71.2% 42.3% 71.4% 50.0% 62.4% 31.9%
30 2007 24/24 4.3 2.3 60.5% 68.8% 44.7% 57.7% 37.1% 59.0% 34.0% 2005 11/11 5.9 3.0 59.7% 62.9% 47.8% 59.8% 46.0% 58.4% 36.6%
31 2008 31/32 3.2 2.0 62.5% 68.6% 50.4% 50.4% 43.5% 61.9% 36.0% 2006 13/13 6.9 3.5 57.3% 71.7% 44.5% 56.0% 30.4% 60.1% 34.1%
32 2009 20/20 4.4 2.7 60.2% 66.9% 49.5% 55.4% 40.2% 60.0% 36.1% 2007 5/5 6.0 3.0 65.7% 71.4% 40.6% 51.0% 15.5% 60.7% 33.9%
33 2010 8/8 1.6 2.3 53.8% 62.6% 45.5% 40.0% 35.4% 54.9% 34.4% 2008 5/5 5.8 2.6 63.6% 65.8% 50.9% 58.0% 31.2% 60.6% 29.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 5.5 4.5 52.3% 69.4% 41.4% 31.0% 49.1% 56.0% 42.4%
Career — 490/565 4.7 2.7 60.2% 70.3% 48.7% 55.7% 40.4% 61.6% 38.0% — 122/132 5.3 3.0 64.5% 66.1% 47.2% 55.4% 36.9% 59.4% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Lapentti George Bastl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1595 115.3 +3.11 +1.13 1.285 52.9% — +53 — 83.3% +1.67 2–0 1–1 — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1569 122.4 -2.38 -0.82 0.920 48.4% -108 +97 +28 40.5% -0.77 7–8 (47%) 12–6 (67%) — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1659 129.3 +0.24 +1.23 1.054 50.8% -156 +64 — 45.0% -0.14 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1595 132.1 -1.83 +0.31 0.932 48.6% -86 +85 — 40.4% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.69 1996 1495 106.7 -1.02 +6.41 0.716 46.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15
22 1999 1883 154.4 +1.96 +3.11 1.116 52.2% -43 -24 — 59.3% +0.58 22–7 (76%) 17–14 (55%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1751 142.0 +0.96 +0.97 1.026 50.6% +22 +87 -251 53.7% +0.39 16–5 (76%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.98 1998 1502 110.8 -1.46 +0.40 0.781 46.0% — — — 30.0% -0.90 1–1 1–0 — -0.32
24 2001 1836 155.3 +1.70 +1.34 1.041 50.6% -27 +112 — 55.1% +0.40 10–5 (67%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.27 1999 1559 129.2 -0.33 +1.04 0.969 49.6% +50 — — 50.0% -0.03 0–2 3–2 (60%) — +0.94
25 2002 1713 133.6 +1.50 +0.61 1.049 50.5% +6 +68 -121 50.6% +0.13 18–9 (67%) 13–13 (50%) — +1.94 2000 1611 132.3 -2.50 +1.37 0.949 49.0% +51 -110 -122 40.7% -0.52 6–4 (60%) 3–9 (25%) — -0.59
26 2003 1697 131.8 -0.81 -0.35 0.961 49.4% -25 +79 — 48.2% -0.17 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.89 2001 1622 126.7 -1.08 +0.30 0.967 49.3% +92 -173 — 41.7% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.23
27 2004 1588 121.8 -0.38 -0.79 0.938 48.5% +44 +67 — 38.0% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.01 2002 1564 112.2 -2.22 -2.35 0.786 45.8% +54 — -26 31.3% -1.19 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.20
28 2005 1575 129.8 -0.05 -0.90 0.948 48.9% -6 +95 — 37.5% -0.70 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.17 2003 1500 93.7 -3.02 +0.52 0.647 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — +0.05
29 2006 1681 124.7 -1.29 +2.41 1.042 50.7% — +73 — 52.7% +0.05 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.31 2004 1491 102.5 -1.47 +0.15 0.847 48.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
30 2007 1611 123.4 -2.74 -2.10 0.829 47.0% -49 +93 -16 38.3% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.08 2005 1564 113.3 -2.00 -0.81 0.880 47.3% +41 — — 37.0% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35
31 2008 1650 136.2 -0.69 -0.13 0.944 48.9% -103 +132 — 48.1% -0.15 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.36 2006 1589 118.6 -2.70 -0.72 0.853 47.5% +30 — -49 35.7% -0.89 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.07
32 2009 1667 132.7 -1.19 +0.26 0.902 48.2% -65 +134 — 40.7% -0.64 5–8 (38%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.19 2007 1523 107.1 -2.47 -1.23 0.863 47.0% +43 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.26
33 2010 1581 117.8 -2.88 -0.42 0.762 44.8% +18 +71 — 26.3% -1.74 0–2 0–1 — -0.76 2008 1619 114.2 -0.33 -1.38 0.737 45.5% +36 — — 25.0% -1.42 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1473 105.8 -1.01 +0.84 0.965 48.7% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 — — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1426 93.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1402 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1386 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1375 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1934 143.0 -0.03 +0.60 0.990 49.8% -30 +76 -105 48.7% -0.07 114–88 (56%) 108–103 (51%) 107.5 +0.25 — 1656 119.8 -1.84 +0.11 0.895 48.0% +55 -135 -62 37.8% -0.72 16–22 (42%) 22–31 (42%) 95.6 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.