H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 3-2

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 3–2 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2000 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2000* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Hicham Arazi #41 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #11 Match data
Mar 19, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Nicolas Lapentti #8 6-2 6-0 Hicham Arazi #34 Match data
Oct 7, 1999* Basel ATP 250 R32 Carpet Hicham Arazi #40 6-3 3-6 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #14 Match data
Aug 7, 1999* Amsterdam ATP 250 QF Clay Nicolas Lapentti #21 2-6 7-5 6-3 Hicham Arazi #40 Match data
May 8, 1999* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #41 6-4 6-0 Hicham Arazi #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 213 48.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 1996 12–16 42.9% #79 1,550 0 0
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,714 0 1
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5 2004 15–17 46.9% #62 1,711 0 1
31 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,672 0 1
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5