H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 3-2

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 3–2 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2000 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-4 6-4.

ECU Age 50 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 2
5 main-draw meetings
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hicham Arazi #41 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #11 Match data Aug 9, 2000* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Nicolas Lapentti #8 6-2 6-0 Hicham Arazi #34 Match data Mar 19, 2000* QF Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Hicham Arazi #40 6-3 3-6 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #14 Match data Oct 7, 1999* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Nicolas Lapentti #21 2-6 7-5 6-3 Hicham Arazi #40 Match data Aug 7, 1999* QF Dutch Open ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Nicolas Lapentti #41 6-4 6-0 Hicham Arazi #32 Match data May 8, 1999* R16 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,933 282 283 49.9% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 215 48.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1996 11–20 35.5% #121 1,568 0 1
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,658 0 1 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,595 0 1 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 1996 12–17 41.4% #79 1,546 0 0
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,750 0 3 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,835 0 4 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,715 0 1
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,713 0 5 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,696 0 5 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 2004 7–15 31.8% #122 1,587 0 5 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,575 0 5 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,680 0 5 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,610 0 5 2004 15–18 45.5% #62 1,701 0 1
31 2008 14–18 43.8% #86 1,650 0 5 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,664 0 1
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,667 0 5
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,581 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Hicham Arazi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 5 0 5 100.0%
19 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1997 3 6 9 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 4 11 15 26.7% 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1996 5 9 14 35.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2000 23 15 38 60.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 19 14 33 57.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 2002 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 17 15 32 53.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2004 5 6 11 45.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 2001 12 9 21 57.1% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 10 8 18 55.6% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2003 7 8 15 46.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 2007 3 5 8 37.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2008 4 6 10 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2009 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
Career 100 114 214 46.7% 154 136 290 53.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 18 17 35 51.4% 80 87 167 47.9% 77 84 161 47.8% 18 17 35 51.4% 27 27 54 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 490/565 of Nicolas Lapentti's and 75/76 of Hicham Arazi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Hicham Arazi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1995 3/5 6.3 2.7 62.2% 77.3% 59.8% 64.6% 47.2% 70.1% 38.4% —/—
19 1996 25/31 3.8 3.4 56.2% 67.4% 47.9% 49.9% 41.1% 58.8% 37.9% —/—
20 1997 32/35 4.4 2.8 60.4% 71.2% 48.1% 56.0% 46.1% 61.9% 40.2% —/—
21 1998 40/45 3.4 3.8 63.2% 67.2% 44.6% 49.7% 42.8% 58.7% 38.4% —/—
22 1999 59/76 5.3 2.4 61.7% 72.0% 50.2% 64.0% 40.2% 63.5% 40.7% —/—
23 2000 53/68 6.3 3.4 57.6% 72.3% 49.1% 61.4% 43.9% 62.4% 38.6% —/—
24 2001 38/52 5.7 3.2 56.1% 74.4% 47.9% 57.3% 41.7% 62.8% 38.8% —/—
25 2002 49/59 6.6 2.6 59.0% 73.4% 49.0% 49.6% 35.4% 63.3% 38.5% —/—
26 2003 41/42 4.9 2.2 61.5% 69.0% 50.1% 56.3% 40.4% 61.7% 36.8% —/—
27 2004 21/22 4.1 2.3 58.4% 68.7% 52.6% 56.8% 36.5% 62.0% 35.6% —/—
28 2005 25/25 3.2 1.6 64.4% 68.8% 50.2% 52.2% 32.3% 62.2% 35.8% —/—
29 2006 21/21 3.5 1.4 63.2% 68.6% 45.4% 60.5% 42.1% 60.2% 41.5% 2003 41/41 3.0 1.5 59.3% 69.4% 52.4% 58.2% 38.9% 62.5% 38.1%
30 2007 24/24 4.3 2.3 60.5% 68.8% 44.7% 57.7% 37.1% 59.0% 34.0% 2004 32/33 4.3 1.9 61.8% 67.8% 53.3% 59.6% 38.9% 62.3% 37.2%
31 2008 31/32 3.2 2.0 62.5% 68.6% 50.4% 50.4% 43.5% 61.9% 36.0% 2005 2/2 2.0 1.0 55.9% 59.0% 42.6% 50.6% 20.0% 51.4% 25.6%
32 2009 20/20 4.4 2.7 60.2% 66.9% 49.5% 55.4% 40.2% 60.0% 36.1% —/—
33 2010 8/8 1.6 2.3 53.8% 62.6% 45.5% 40.0% 35.4% 54.9% 34.4% —/—
Career 490/565 4.7 2.7 60.2% 70.3% 48.7% 55.7% 40.4% 61.6% 38.0% 75/417 3.5 1.7 60.3% 68.4% 52.5% 58.6% 38.4% 62.1% 37.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Hicham Arazi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1595 115.3 +3.11 +1.13 1.285 52.9% +53 83.3% +1.67 2–0 1–1 +0.73
19 1996 1569 122.4 -2.38 -0.82 0.920 48.4% -108 +97 +28 40.5% -0.77 7–8 (47%) 12–6 (67%) 105.5 +0.89
20 1997 1659 129.3 +0.24 +1.23 1.054 50.8% -156 +64 45.0% -0.14 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 99.3 +0.41 1994 1487 97.9 0.0% -3.50 0–1 +0.09
21 1998 1595 132.1 -1.83 +0.31 0.932 48.6% -86 +85 40.4% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 5–8 (38%) 96.4 -0.69 1995 1457 106.7 +66 29.4% -1.30 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.11
22 1999 1883 154.4 +1.96 +3.11 1.116 52.2% -43 -24 59.3% +0.58 22–7 (76%) 17–14 (55%) 114.8 -1.12 1996 1546 121.8 +2 -25 +68 41.3% -0.65 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) 103.3 +0.69
23 2000 1751 142.0 +0.96 +0.97 1.026 50.6% +22 +87 -251 53.7% +0.39 16–5 (76%) 12–16 (43%) 103.3 +1.98 1997 1625 136.9 -45 +82 -20 50.4% -0.07 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 105.0 +0.56
24 2001 1836 155.3 +1.70 +1.34 1.041 50.6% -27 +112 55.1% +0.40 10–5 (67%) 7–10 (41%) 104.2 -1.27 1998 1716 146.6 -39 +16 -91 49.6% 0.00 5–11 (31%) 6–10 (38%) 94.1 -3.26
25 2002 1713 133.6 +1.50 +0.61 1.049 50.5% +6 +68 -121 50.6% +0.13 18–9 (67%) 13–13 (50%) 103.5 +1.94 1999 1702 141.7 -21 +82 47.4% -0.41 9–5 (64%) 14–8 (64%) 107.1 -3.32
26 2003 1697 131.8 -0.81 -0.35 0.961 49.4% -25 +79 48.2% -0.17 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 97.2 +0.89 2000 1775 143.8 +25 -55 -150 53.7% +0.23 12–7 (63%) 5–10 (33%) 103.1 +0.15
27 2004 1588 121.8 -0.38 -0.79 0.938 48.5% +44 +67 38.0% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.01 2001 1834 144.1 +20 -121 -176 53.4% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 16–9 (64%) 106.4 -0.90
28 2005 1575 129.8 -0.05 -0.90 0.948 48.9% -6 +95 37.5% -0.70 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 98.7 -1.17 2002 1700 126.9 +97 -76 46.7% -0.31 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 95.0 -0.75
29 2006 1681 124.7 -1.29 +2.41 1.042 50.7% +73 52.7% +0.05 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 105.6 +0.31 2003 1718 135.5 -0.40 +1.29 1.017 50.1% +50 -87 -83 51.0% +0.17 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 101.0 +0.03
30 2007 1611 123.4 -2.74 -2.10 0.829 47.0% -49 +93 -16 38.3% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +0.08 2004 1702 135.1 -0.45 +0.35 0.986 49.8% +29 -110 +6 46.0% -0.25 3–6 (33%) 7–9 (44%) 95.1 -0.40
31 2008 1650 136.2 -0.69 -0.13 0.944 48.9% -103 +132 48.1% -0.15 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) 101.0 +0.36 2005 1665 97.8 -2.62 -3.75 0.527 39.2% 0.0% -3.75 -0.02
32 2009 1667 132.7 -1.19 +0.26 0.902 48.2% -65 +134 40.7% -0.64 5–8 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 103.7 -1.19
33 2010 1581 117.8 -2.88 -0.42 0.762 44.8% +18 +71 26.3% -1.74 0–2 0–1 -0.76
Career 1934 143.0 -0.03 +0.60 0.990 49.8% -30 +76 -105 48.7% -0.07 114–88 (56%) 108–103 (51%) 107.5 +0.25 1865 143.4 -0.48 +0.75 0.987 49.7% +14 -4 -63 48.9% -0.15 65–63 (51%) 79–72 (52%) 104.2 -1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.