H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-1
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 2–1 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2003 Sydney third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2003* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-2 6-0 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 3-6 6-3 6-4 3-6 8-6 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2000* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 7-5 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nicolas Lapentti | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |