H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Jan Vacek H2H: 0-1

Jan Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Vacek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Vacek won the 2007 Eastbourne Open first round 7-6(1) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 50 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jan Vacek
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan Vacek #277 7-6(1) 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #63 Match data Jun 21, 2007* R32 Eastbourne Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,933 282 283 49.9% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Jan Vacek #1,155 #61 646 1,640 30 59 33.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Jan Vacek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 11–20 35.5% #121 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,595 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,750 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,835 0 4 — — — — — — —
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,713 0 5 2001 8–6 57.1% #75 1,630 0 1
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,696 0 5 2002 10–24 29.4% #110 1,552 0 1
27 2004 7–15 31.8% #122 1,587 0 5 2003 5–13 27.8% #129 1,566 0 1
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,575 0 5 2004 3–12 20.0% #176 1,480 0 1
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,680 0 5 2005 1–1 50.0% #260 1,463 0 1
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,610 0 5 2006 1–1 50.0% #298 1,489 0 1
31 2008 14–18 43.8% #86 1,650 0 5 2007 1–1 50.0% #235 1,553 0 1
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,667 0 5 2008 1–1 50.0% #563 1,593 0 1
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,581 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Jan Vacek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 3 6 9 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 4 11 15 26.7% 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 23 15 38 60.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2002 3 14 17 17.6% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2004 5 6 11 45.5% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 11 12 8.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
29 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2007 3 5 8 37.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2008 4 6 10 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2009 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 100 114 214 46.7% 154 136 290 53.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 18 17 35 51.4% — 12 33 45 26.7% 4 11 15 26.7% 14 15 29 48.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 490/565 of Nicolas Lapentti's and 83/89 of Jan Vacek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Jan Vacek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1995 3/5 6.3 2.7 62.2% 77.3% 59.8% 64.6% 47.2% 70.1% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 25/31 3.8 3.4 56.2% 67.4% 47.9% 49.9% 41.1% 58.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 32/35 4.4 2.8 60.4% 71.2% 48.1% 56.0% 46.1% 61.9% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 40/45 3.4 3.8 63.2% 67.2% 44.6% 49.7% 42.8% 58.7% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 59/76 5.3 2.4 61.7% 72.0% 50.2% 64.0% 40.2% 63.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 53/68 6.3 3.4 57.6% 72.3% 49.1% 61.4% 43.9% 62.4% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 38/52 5.7 3.2 56.1% 74.4% 47.9% 57.3% 41.7% 62.8% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 49/59 6.6 2.6 59.0% 73.4% 49.0% 49.6% 35.4% 63.3% 38.5% 2001 13/14 3.6 3.5 58.9% 67.7% 50.3% 45.4% 45.8% 60.6% 38.8%
26 2003 41/42 4.9 2.2 61.5% 69.0% 50.1% 56.3% 40.4% 61.7% 36.8% 2002 29/34 5.6 3.6 56.5% 70.3% 48.6% 54.8% 36.3% 61.1% 34.1%
27 2004 21/22 4.1 2.3 58.4% 68.7% 52.6% 56.8% 36.5% 62.0% 35.6% 2003 18/18 3.6 2.9 56.2% 68.5% 47.4% 53.2% 35.6% 59.4% 34.4%
28 2005 25/25 3.2 1.6 64.4% 68.8% 50.2% 52.2% 32.3% 62.2% 35.8% 2004 15/15 4.5 3.4 57.9% 67.7% 47.4% 50.9% 36.3% 58.9% 31.2%
29 2006 21/21 3.5 1.4 63.2% 68.6% 45.4% 60.5% 42.1% 60.2% 41.5% 2005 2/2 4.5 2.5 68.4% 66.3% 50.0% 75.0% 51.3% 62.1% 48.8%
30 2007 24/24 4.3 2.3 60.5% 68.8% 44.7% 57.7% 37.1% 59.0% 34.0% 2006 2/2 5.0 3.5 58.9% 69.4% 58.0% 68.3% 64.3% 64.7% 34.6%
31 2008 31/32 3.2 2.0 62.5% 68.6% 50.4% 50.4% 43.5% 61.9% 36.0% 2007 2/2 5.0 1.5 67.0% 66.4% 43.6% 60.7% 25.0% 58.9% 33.3%
32 2009 20/20 4.4 2.7 60.2% 66.9% 49.5% 55.4% 40.2% 60.0% 36.1% 2008 2/2 2.5 3.5 58.4% 74.4% 50.9% 35.7% 75.0% 64.5% 29.5%
33 2010 8/8 1.6 2.3 53.8% 62.6% 45.5% 40.0% 35.4% 54.9% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 490/565 4.7 2.7 60.2% 70.3% 48.7% 55.7% 40.4% 61.6% 38.0% — 83/89 4.5 3.3 57.7% 68.9% 48.6% 52.8% 39.3% 60.4% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Jan Vacek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1595 115.3 +3.11 +1.13 1.285 52.9% — +53 — 83.3% +1.67 2–0 1–1 — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1569 122.4 -2.38 -0.82 0.920 48.4% -108 +97 +28 40.5% -0.77 7–8 (47%) 12–6 (67%) — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1659 129.3 +0.24 +1.23 1.054 50.8% -156 +64 — 45.0% -0.14 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1595 132.1 -1.83 +0.31 0.932 48.6% -86 +85 — 40.4% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1883 154.4 +1.96 +3.11 1.116 52.2% -43 -24 — 59.3% +0.58 22–7 (76%) 17–14 (55%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1751 142.0 +0.96 +0.97 1.026 50.6% +22 +87 -251 53.7% +0.39 16–5 (76%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 1836 155.3 +1.70 +1.34 1.041 50.6% -27 +112 — 55.1% +0.40 10–5 (67%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.27 2000 1484 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 1713 133.6 +1.50 +0.61 1.049 50.5% +6 +68 -121 50.6% +0.13 18–9 (67%) 13–13 (50%) — +1.94 2001 1630 116.6 -0.42 -0.21 0.985 49.3% +23 -115 — 48.7% -0.31 6–1 (86%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.77
26 2003 1697 131.8 -0.81 -0.35 0.961 49.4% -25 +79 — 48.2% -0.17 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.89 2002 1553 117.1 -1.69 -2.23 0.877 47.9% -35 -78 +72 34.1% -0.94 3–9 (25%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.04
27 2004 1588 121.8 -0.38 -0.79 0.938 48.5% +44 +67 — 38.0% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.01 2003 1566 124.4 -2.06 -1.73 0.846 46.9% -78 — +148 33.3% -1.09 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.22
28 2005 1575 129.8 -0.05 -0.90 0.948 48.9% -6 +95 — 37.5% -0.70 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.17 2004 1480 108.1 -2.52 -3.37 0.758 45.6% +9 +2 +122 23.7% -1.55 1–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.51
29 2006 1681 124.7 -1.29 +2.41 1.042 50.7% — +73 — 52.7% +0.05 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.31 2005 1463 101.9 -0.51 +0.49 1.286 55.2% — — — 50.0% +1.75 — 0–2 — +0.11
30 2007 1611 123.4 -2.74 -2.10 0.829 47.0% -49 +93 -16 38.3% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.08 2006 1490 103.0 -0.56 -0.98 0.981 49.8% — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 1–1 — -0.08
31 2008 1650 136.2 -0.69 -0.13 0.944 48.9% -103 +132 — 48.1% -0.15 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.36 2007 1554 115.4 +0.01 -0.65 0.809 46.6% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — 1–0 — -0.15
32 2009 1667 132.7 -1.19 +0.26 0.902 48.2% -65 +134 — 40.7% -0.64 5–8 (38%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.19 2008 1593 119.8 +1.96 +2.19 0.832 48.1% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 — — -0.03
33 2010 1581 117.8 -2.88 -0.42 0.762 44.8% +18 +71 — 26.3% -1.74 0–2 0–1 — -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1934 143.0 -0.03 +0.60 0.990 49.8% -30 +76 -105 48.7% -0.07 114–88 (56%) 108–103 (51%) 107.5 +0.25 — 1640 120.6 -1.54 -1.77 0.874 47.7% -28 -69 +109 35.8% -0.88 14–16 (47%) 14–15 (48%) 101.6 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.