H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Jan Vacek H2H: 0-1
Jan Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Vacek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Vacek won the 2007 Nottingham third round 7-6(1) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2007* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Jan Vacek | 7-6(1) 6-3 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Jan Vacek | #1,155 | #61 | 646 | 1,640 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Lapentti | Jan Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #110 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #129 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #176 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,463 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #563 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |