H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Jared Palmer H2H: 1-0

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 1–0 lead over Jared Palmer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 1999 Indianapolis round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 50 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jared Palmer
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Lapentti #20 6-2 6-2 Jared Palmer #242 Match data Aug 19, 1999* R32 Indianapolis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,933 282 283 49.9% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Jared Palmer #1,385 #35 908 1,793 69 80 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Jared Palmer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 1–2 33.3% #517 1,510 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 3–2 60.0% #240 1,575 0 0
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1 1990 1–2 33.3% #564 1,567 0 0
19 1996 11–20 35.5% #121 1,568 0 1 1991 1–3 25.0% #427 1,521 0 0
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,658 0 1 1992 2–4 33.3% #149 1,536 0 0
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,595 0 1 1993 9–14 39.1% #105 1,605 0 0
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 1994 28–20 58.3% #36 1,790 0 1
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,750 0 3 1995 17–20 45.9% #125 1,717 0 1
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,835 0 4 1996 4–7 36.4% #214 1,651 0 1
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,713 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,696 0 5 1998 0–3 0.0% #174 1,598 0 1
27 2004 7–15 31.8% #122 1,587 0 5 1999 1–1 50.0% #435 1,611 0 1
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,575 0 5 2000 2–2 50.0% #357 1,621 0 1
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,680 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,610 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2008 14–18 43.8% #86 1,650 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,667 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,581 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Jared Palmer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1997 3 6 9 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 4 11 15 26.7% 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1994 14 13 27 51.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2000 23 15 38 60.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 10 10 20 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2002 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2004 5 6 11 45.5% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — — 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 3 5 8 37.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 4 6 10 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 100 114 214 46.7% 154 136 290 53.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 18 17 35 51.4% — 37 43 80 46.2% 19 18 37 51.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 6 8 14 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Jared Palmer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1511 103.7 — — — — — — — 36.4% -0.45 1–1 — — +0.08
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1575 120.0 — — — — +29 — — 61.5% +0.23 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.46
18 1995 1595 115.3 +3.11 +1.13 1.285 52.9% — +53 — 83.3% +1.67 2–0 1–1 — +0.73 1990 1568 102.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.10
19 1996 1569 122.4 -2.38 -0.82 0.920 48.4% -108 +97 +28 40.5% -0.77 7–8 (47%) 12–6 (67%) — +0.89 1991 1522 96.9 — — — — — — — 36.4% -1.09 0–1 1–1 — +0.70
20 1997 1659 129.3 +0.24 +1.23 1.054 50.8% -156 +64 — 45.0% -0.14 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.41 1992 1537 116.7 — — — — +37 — — 44.4% -0.44 0–2 — — +0.01
21 1998 1595 132.1 -1.83 +0.31 0.932 48.6% -86 +85 — 40.4% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.69 1993 1606 122.8 — — — — -14 -61 -33 47.5% -0.26 0–8 (0%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.34
22 1999 1883 154.4 +1.96 +3.11 1.116 52.2% -43 -24 — 59.3% +0.58 22–7 (76%) 17–14 (55%) — -1.12 1994 1790 143.7 — — — — -57 -106 — 55.1% +0.46 8–7 (53%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.51
23 2000 1751 142.0 +0.96 +0.97 1.026 50.6% +22 +87 -251 53.7% +0.39 16–5 (76%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.98 1995 1717 129.7 — — — — -40 -20 -96 47.1% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.01
24 2001 1836 155.3 +1.70 +1.34 1.041 50.6% -27 +112 — 55.1% +0.40 10–5 (67%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.27 1996 1652 119.0 — — — — — -27 +6 44.1% -0.03 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.12
25 2002 1713 133.6 +1.50 +0.61 1.049 50.5% +6 +68 -121 50.6% +0.13 18–9 (67%) 13–13 (50%) — +1.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 1697 131.8 -0.81 -0.35 0.961 49.4% -25 +79 — 48.2% -0.17 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.89 1998 1598 96.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — +0.19
27 2004 1588 121.8 -0.38 -0.79 0.938 48.5% +44 +67 — 38.0% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.01 1999 1612 106.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 0–1 — -0.30
28 2005 1575 129.8 -0.05 -0.90 0.948 48.9% -6 +95 — 37.5% -0.70 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.17 2000 1621 116.8 — — — — +49 — — 50.0% +0.70 1–1 0–1 — -0.46
29 2006 1681 124.7 -1.29 +2.41 1.042 50.7% — +73 — 52.7% +0.05 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1611 123.4 -2.74 -2.10 0.829 47.0% -49 +93 -16 38.3% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1650 136.2 -0.69 -0.13 0.944 48.9% -103 +132 — 48.1% -0.15 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1667 132.7 -1.19 +0.26 0.902 48.2% -65 +134 — 40.7% -0.64 5–8 (38%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1581 117.8 -2.88 -0.42 0.762 44.8% +18 +71 — 26.3% -1.74 0–2 0–1 — -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1934 143.0 -0.03 +0.60 0.990 49.8% -30 +76 -105 48.7% -0.07 114–88 (56%) 108–103 (51%) 107.5 +0.25 — 1794 135.2 — — — — -28 -66 -49 48.1% -0.12 19–31 (38%) 35–37 (49%) 97.4 -0.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.